CAT 2011 VARC Slot 2 Question Paper(Available):Download Solution with Answer Key

- Step 1: Identify the key focus of the passage. The passage discusses the transformative impact of social media on communication and then highlights specific concerns.

- Step 2: Locate the concerns. The second sentence explicitly states, "it has also raised concerns about privacy, misinformation, and mental health," indicating these are the primary issues.

- Step 3: Analyze the options. Option (1) "Lack of user engagement" is incorrect as the passage mentions companies enhancing engagement, not a lack of it. Option (3) "Slow global connectivity" contradicts the passage's emphasis on "instant connectivity." Option (4) "High investment costs" is mentioned but not as a concern, rather as a strategy by companies. Option (2) directly lists the concerns mentioned.

- Step 4: Verify. Reread the passage to confirm no other concerns are prioritized over privacy, misinformation, and mental health. The sentence structure emphasizes these issues immediately after the benefits.

- Step 5: Cross-check for alternative interpretations. The passage does not suggest other primary concerns, making option (2) the most accurate.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct as it matches the passage’s explicit mention of concerns.
Quick Tip: In reading comprehension, focus on explicit statements in the passage to identify primary concerns or themes, and eliminate options that contradict or misalign with the text.

- Step 1: Identify relevant information. The passage states, "Studies suggest that excessive use of social media can lead to anxiety and reduced attention spans, particularly among teenagers."

- Step 2: Focus on consequences. The question asks for a consequence, and the passage directly mentions "anxiety and reduced attention spans" as outcomes of excessive use.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Improved attention spans" is incorrect as the passage says "reduced attention spans." Option (2) "Increased anxiety" aligns with the passage’s mention of anxiety. Option (3) "Enhanced global connectivity" is a benefit, not a consequence of excessive use. Option (4) "Reduced algorithm investment" is unrelated to excessive use.

- Step 4: Verify specificity. The passage links anxiety directly to excessive use, making it a clear consequence. Reduced attention spans is another, but it’s not listed as an option.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other options reflect the negative outcomes mentioned in the passage.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct as it directly corresponds to the passage’s statement.
Quick Tip: For consequence questions, look for cause-and-effect relationships in the passage and match them precisely to the options.

- Step 1: Identify company-related information. The passage states, "social media platforms continue to grow, with companies investing heavily in algorithms to enhance user engagement."

- Step 2: Analyze for inference. The question asks for an inference, meaning we need a logical conclusion based on the passage. The statement about investment in algorithms directly implies effort to increase user engagement.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Reducing their presence globally" contradicts the passage’s mention of platforms growing. Option (2) "Investing in user engagement" aligns with the passage’s statement about algorithm investment. Option (3) "Unaware of privacy concerns" is not supported, as the passage doesn’t discuss the companies’ awareness. Option (4) "Decreasing algorithm development" contradicts the passage’s mention of heavy investment.

- Step 4: Verify inference. The passage explicitly links investment to enhancing engagement, making option (2) a direct inference.

- Step 5: Cross-check for alternatives. No other option logically follows from the passage’s information about companies.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct as it reflects the passage’s explicit statement.
Quick Tip: For inference questions, choose options that logically follow from explicit information without introducing external assumptions.

- Step 1: Identify the opening sentence. Sentence C introduces Meera and her love for painting, setting the context. It’s logical as the starting point.

- Step 2: Determine the sequence. Sentence B mentions her family’s objection, which follows C as it contrasts Meera’s passion. Sentence A states her decision to pursue painting, logically following the family’s urging in B. Sentence D concludes with her action (enrolling in art school) despite objections, linking to A and B.

- Step 3: Test the sequence C, B, A, D. C: Meera’s love for painting. B: Family urges stability. A: Meera decides to pursue painting. D: She enrolls despite objections. This forms a coherent narrative.

- Step 4: Evaluate options. Option (1) C, A, B, D places A (decision) before B (objection), which is illogical as objections precede decisions. Option (2) C, B, A, D follows the logical flow. Option (3) A, C, B, D starts with the decision, lacking context. Option (4) B, C, A, D starts with objection without introducing Meera’s passion.

- Step 5: Verify coherence. C, B, A, D reads smoothly: Meera’s passion, family’s objection, her decision, and action.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In para-jumbles, identify the introductory sentence and follow the logical flow of events or ideas.

- Step 1: Analyze subject-verb agreement. The subject "She" is singular, third person, requiring "doesn’t" (does not) for negation and the base verb form.

- Step 2: Evaluate options. Option (1) uses "don’t," incorrect for third-person singular. Option (2) uses "doesn’t likes," incorrect as "likes" should be "like" after "doesn’t." Option (3) uses "doesn’t like," correct for subject-verb agreement. Option (4) uses "don’t likes," incorrect for both "don’t" and "likes."

- Step 3: Verify grammar. In option (3), "doesn’t" (does not) + base verb "like" is standard English.

- Step 4: Cross-check. Options (1), (2), and (4) violate standard grammar rules for negation and verb form.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (3) is correct.
Quick Tip: For sentence correction, ensure subject-verb agreement and correct verb forms, especially with negatives.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Ephemeral" means lasting for a short time, often fleeting or transient.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Permanent" is the opposite, meaning lasting forever. Option (2) "Temporary" aligns with short-lived. Option (3) "Ancient" refers to old age, unrelated. Option (4) "Complex" refers to intricacy, not duration.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Temporary" is a direct synonym for ephemeral, as both imply brevity.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Permanent, ancient, and complex do not relate to the concept of short duration.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For synonym questions, recall the precise meaning of the word and eliminate antonyms or unrelated terms.

- Step 1: Analyze the statement. "All successful entrepreneurs are risk-takers" means every successful entrepreneur (S) is a risk-taker (R), or S \(\rightarrow\) R.

- Step 2: Evaluate the conclusion. The conclusion states, "If a person is not a risk-taker, they cannot be a successful entrepreneur," i.e., \(\neg R \rightarrow \neg S\).

- Step 3: Apply logical reasoning. The statement S \(\rightarrow\) R implies its contrapositive \(\neg R \rightarrow \neg S\) is true. The conclusion matches the contrapositive.

- Step 4: Test for validity. If someone is not a risk-taker (\(\neg R\)), they cannot be a successful entrepreneur (\(\neg S\)), as all successful entrepreneurs must be risk-takers.

- Step 5: Check options. Option (1) "Yes" aligns with the logical validity of the conclusion. Option (2) "No" is incorrect as the conclusion follows logically. Option (3) "Partially valid" is not applicable in strict logic. Option (4) "Cannot determine" is incorrect as the conclusion can be determined.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (1) is correct.
Quick Tip: For critical reasoning, use logical implications and check for the contrapositive to validate conclusions.

- Step 1: Locate benefits in the passage. The passage states, "online education offers flexibility and access to diverse resources."

- Step 2: Identify the benefit. Flexibility is explicitly mentioned as a positive aspect of online learning.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Enhanced personal interaction" is incorrect as the passage notes a lack of personal interaction. Option (2) "Greater flexibility" matches the passage. Option (3) "Improved self-discipline" is incorrect as students struggle with self-discipline. Option (4) "Reduced resource access" contradicts the passage’s mention of diverse resources.

- Step 4: Verify. The passage emphasizes flexibility as a key advantage, alongside resource access, but only flexibility is listed.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other options align with the passage’s benefits.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For benefit questions, focus on positive aspects explicitly stated in the passage.

- Step 1: Identify teacher-related challenges. The passage states, "Teachers face challenges in engaging students virtually."

- Step 2: Match with options. Option (2) directly quotes the passage’s challenge.

- Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options. Option (1) "Lack of resources" is incorrect as the passage mentions access to diverse resources. Option (3) "Reduced flexibility" contradicts the passage’s mention of flexibility as a benefit. Option (4) "Excessive personal interaction" is incorrect as the passage notes a lack of interaction.

- Step 4: Verify. The passage explicitly identifies engaging students as the teacher’s challenge.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other challenges for teachers are mentioned.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For challenge questions, look for explicit difficulties mentioned in the passage and avoid assumptions.

- Step 1: Locate student-related information. The passage states, "students struggle with self-discipline" in online education.

- Step 2: Infer the impact. The struggle implies that online education requires more self-discipline, as students face challenges in maintaining it.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Eliminates the need for self-discipline" is incorrect as students struggle with it. Option (2) "Increases the need for self-discipline" aligns with the passage’s implication. Option (3) "Reduces access to resources" contradicts the passage’s mention of diverse resources. Option (4) "Enhances classroom interaction" contradicts the lack of personal interaction.

- Step 4: Verify inference. The struggle with self-discipline logically infers a greater need for it in online settings.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other options reflect the passage’s focus on student challenges.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For inference questions, derive conclusions directly from the passage’s implications, avoiding external assumptions.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Candid" means being open, truthful, or straightforward.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Deceptive" is an antonym, meaning misleading. Option (2) "Honest" aligns with being truthful. Option (3) "Reserved" suggests being restrained, not open. Option (4) "Complex" is unrelated to truthfulness.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Honest" is a direct synonym for candid, both implying sincerity.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Deceptive, reserved, and complex do not convey openness or truthfulness.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For vocabulary questions, recall the word’s meaning and eliminate options that are antonyms or unrelated.

- Step 1: Analyze the sentence. The word "dangerous" suggests a negative outcome, so the blank requires a negative adjective describing the decision.

- Step 2: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Prudent" means cautious and wise, contradicting "dangerous." Option (2) "Reckless" means careless and risky, aligning with "dangerous." Option (3) "Justified" implies reasonableness, not fitting with "dangerous." Option (4) "Ethical" relates to morality, not risk.

- Step 3: Verify context. "Reckless" fits as ignoring economic data is risky and aligns with a dangerous outcome.

- Step 4: Cross-check. No other option conveys a negative, risky decision.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In sentence completion, choose words that match the tone and context of the sentence, especially with clue words like "dangerous."

- Step 1: Identify the opening sentence. Sentence C introduces the town and its festival, providing context.

- Step 2: Determine the sequence. Sentence B describes what the festival celebrates (music and dance), logically following C. Sentence A mentions the festival’s popularity (thousands of visitors), expanding on B. Sentence D details performers’ participation, concluding the paragraph.

- Step 3: Test sequence C, B, A, D. C: Town known for festival. B: Festival celebrates culture. A: Attracts thousands. D: Performers participate. This flows logically.

- Step 4: Evaluate options. Option (1) C, A, B, D places A (visitors) before B (festival’s nature), which is less coherent. Option (2) C, B, A, D follows a natural progression. Option (3) A, C, B, D starts with visitors without context. Option (4) B, C, A, D starts with celebration without introducing the festival.

- Step 5: Verify coherence. C, B, A, D forms a clear narrative from introduction to details.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In para-jumbles, start with a general context sentence and follow with details in a logical sequence.

- Step 1: Analyze subject-verb agreement. "Team" is a singular collective noun, requiring a singular verb ("is").

- Step 2: Check verb form. The present continuous tense ("working") is appropriate for ongoing action.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) uses "are," incorrect for a singular subject. Option (2) uses "is working," correct for singular subject and tense. Option (3) uses "were work," incorrect verb form. Option (4) uses "is work," incorrect as it lacks the continuous form.

- Step 4: Verify. "The team is working" follows standard grammar for singular subjects and present continuous tense.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For collective nouns like "team," use singular verbs unless referring to individuals within the group.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Mundane" means commonplace, ordinary, or lacking excitement.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Exciting" is an antonym. Option (2) "Ordinary" aligns with the definition. Option (3) "Rare" is the opposite of commonplace. Option (4) "Complex" is unrelated to simplicity or ordinariness.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Ordinary" is a direct synonym for mundane.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Exciting, rare, and complex do not match the meaning.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For synonym questions, eliminate antonyms and unrelated terms to narrow down the correct choice.

- Step 1: Analyze the statement. "All doctors are highly educated" means D \(\rightarrow\) E (if doctor, then highly educated).

- Step 2: Evaluate the conclusion. The conclusion states, "If a person is highly educated, they are a doctor," i.e., E \(\rightarrow\) D.

- Step 3: Apply logical reasoning. The statement D \(\rightarrow\) E does not imply E \(\rightarrow\) D. Other professions (e.g., engineers) can also be highly educated, so the conclusion is invalid.

- Step 4: Test for validity. A highly educated person may not be a doctor, breaking the conclusion.

- Step 5: Check options. Option (1) "Yes" is incorrect as the conclusion is not logically valid. Option (2) "No" is correct. Option (3) "Partially valid" does not apply. Option (4) "Cannot determine" is incorrect as validity can be assessed.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: Avoid converse errors in logical reasoning; A \(\rightarrow\) B does not imply B \(\rightarrow\) A.

- Step 1: Identify consequence in the passage. The passage states, "Rising temperatures are causing polar ice to melt, leading to habitat loss for species like polar bears."

- Step 2: Match with options. Option (2) directly states "Habitat loss for polar bears."

- Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options. Option (1) "Increased carbon emissions" is a cause, not a consequence. Option (3) "Rapid policy implementation" contradicts the passage’s mention of slow progress. Option (4) "Decreased public awareness" contradicts growing awareness.

- Step 4: Verify. The passage explicitly links rising temperatures to habitat loss via melting ice.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other consequence is as directly stated.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For consequence questions, identify direct cause-effect relationships in the passage.

- Step 1: Locate relevant information. The passage states, "progress is slow due to economic priorities."

- Step 2: Match with options. Option (2) "Economic priorities" is directly stated.

- Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options. Option (1) "Lack of public awareness" is incorrect as awareness is growing. Option (3) "Absence of government policies" is incorrect as policies are being implemented. Option (4) "Rapid ecosystem recovery" is not mentioned.

- Step 4: Verify. The passage explicitly attributes slow progress to economic priorities.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No other reasons for slow progress are provided.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For "why" questions, look for explicit reasons provided in the passage.

- Step 1: Locate relevant information. The passage states, "Public awareness is growing, yet individual actions often fall short."

- Step 2: Infer from the statement. "Growing" directly implies increasing awareness.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Decreasing" contradicts the passage. Option (2) "Stagnant" suggests no change, which is incorrect. Option (3) "Growing" matches the passage. Option (4) "Irrelevant" is not supported.

- Step 4: Verify. The passage explicitly states awareness is growing.

- Step 5: Cross-check. No contradictory information exists.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (3) is correct.
Quick Tip: For inference questions, choose options that directly reflect the passage’s explicit statements.

- Step 1: Analyze the sentence. "Captivated throughout" implies the speech was engaging and positive, so the blank requires a positive adjective.

- Step 2: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Monotonous" means boring, contradicting captivation. Option (2) "Eloquent" means expressive and persuasive, fitting captivation. Option (3) "Vague" implies unclear, not engaging. Option (4) "Tedious" means dull, contradicting the context.

- Step 3: Verify context. "Eloquent" aligns with a captivating speech.

- Step 4: Cross-check. No other option suggests an engaging quality.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In sentence completion, use context clues to choose words that align with the sentence’s tone.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Pragmatic" means dealing with things sensibly and realistically, focusing on practical outcomes.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Idealistic" means pursuing perfection, often unrealistically. Option (2) "Practical" aligns with pragmatic’s focus on realism. Option (3) "Emotional" is unrelated to practicality. Option (4) "Theoretical" contrasts with practical application.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Practical" is a direct synonym for pragmatic.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Idealistic, emotional, and theoretical do not match the meaning.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For synonym questions, focus on the core meaning of the word and eliminate unrelated terms.

- Step 1: Identify the opening sentence. Sentence C introduces the author and her novel, setting the context.

- Step 2: Determine the sequence. Sentence B describes the novel’s themes, logically following C. Sentence A mentions its success (bestseller), expanding on B. Sentence D concludes with critics’ praise, linking to A.

- Step 3: Test sequence C, B, A, D. C: Author launches novel. B: Novel’s themes. A: Becomes bestseller. D: Critics praise it. This flows logically.

- Step 4: Evaluate options. Option (1) C, A, B, D places success before themes, less coherent. Option (2) C, B, A, D is logical. Option (3) A, C, B, D starts with success without context. Option (4) B, C, A, D starts with themes without introducing the novel.

- Step 5: Verify coherence. C, B, A, D forms a clear narrative.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In para-jumbles, ensure the sequence introduces the topic before elaborating on details.

- Step 1: Analyze subject-verb agreement. "He" is singular, third person, requiring "has" for present perfect tense.

- Step 2: Check verb form. Present perfect tense requires "has" + past participle ("finished").

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) uses "have," incorrect for third-person singular. Option (2) uses "has finish," incorrect verb form. Option (3) uses "has finished," correct. Option (4) uses "have finish," incorrect for both verb and form.

- Step 4: Verify. "He has finished" follows standard grammar for present perfect tense.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (3) is correct.
Quick Tip: For present perfect tense, use "has" for singular subjects and the past participle form of the verb.

- Step 1: Analyze the statement. "All roses are flowers" means every rose is a flower (R \(\rightarrow\) F).

- Step 2: Evaluate the conclusion. "Some flowers are roses" means there exist flowers that are roses.

- Step 3: Apply logical reasoning. If all roses are flowers, and assuming roses exist, then some flowers must be roses.

- Step 4: Test for validity. The conclusion holds as long as at least one rose exists, which is a reasonable assumption in context.

- Step 5: Check options. Option (1) "Yes" is correct. Option (2) "No" is incorrect as the conclusion follows. Option (3) "Partially valid" is not applicable. Option (4) "Cannot determine" is incorrect as the conclusion is determinable.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (1) is correct.
Quick Tip: For "some" conclusions, check if the statement implies the existence of the subset.

- Step 1: Analyze the sentence. "Due to the team’s dedication" implies a positive outcome, so the blank requires a positive phrase.

- Step 2: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Behind schedule" is negative, contradicting dedication. Option (2) "On time" is positive, aligning with dedication. Option (3) "Without effort" contradicts dedication. Option (4) "With errors" is negative.

- Step 3: Verify context. Dedication likely leads to timely completion.

- Step 4: Cross-check. No other option fits a positive outcome.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In sentence completion, match the tone of the cause (e.g., dedication) with the effect.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Obscure" means unclear, hidden, or not well-known.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Clear" is an antonym. Option (2) "Hidden" aligns with being unclear or concealed. Option (3) "Prominent" means well-known, opposite to obscure. Option (4) "Simple" is unrelated.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Hidden" matches the sense of being obscure or concealed.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Clear, prominent, and simple do not fit.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For synonyms, focus on the primary meaning and eliminate antonyms first.

- Step 1: Identify the opening sentence. Sentence A introduces the recycling program, setting the context.

- Step 2: Determine the sequence. Sentence B states the program’s goal, following A. Sentence C describes resident education, a logical step after the goal. Sentence D concludes with participation results.

- Step 3: Test sequence A, B, C, D. A: City introduces program. B: Program’s goal. C: Education efforts. D: Participation success. This is coherent.

- Step 4: Evaluate options. Option (1) A, B, C, D is logical. Option (2) A, C, B, D places education before the goal, less logical. Option (3) B, A, C, D starts with the goal without context. Option (4) C, A, B, D starts with education without introducing the program.

- Step 5: Verify coherence. A, B, C, D flows naturally.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (1) is correct.
Quick Tip: In para-jumbles, sequence from introduction to outcome for a logical flow.

- Step 1: Analyze subject-verb agreement. "Meera" is singular, third person, requiring "enjoys" (third-person singular).

- Step 2: Check verb form. The verb "enjoy" is followed by a gerund ("reading").

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) uses "enjoy," incorrect for third-person singular. Option (2) uses "enjoys read," incorrect verb form. Option (3) uses "enjoys reading," correct. Option (4) uses "enjoy read," incorrect for both verb and form.

- Step 4: Verify. "Meera enjoys reading" is standard English.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (3) is correct.
Quick Tip: Verbs like "enjoy" require gerunds (verb + -ing) as objects in standard English.

- Step 1: Analyze the statement. "No cats are dogs" means the sets of cats and dogs are disjoint (C \(\cap\) D = \(\emptyset\)).

- Step 2: Evaluate the conclusion. "No dogs are cats" means D \(\cap\) C = \(\emptyset\), which is the same as C \(\cap\) D = \(\emptyset\).

- Step 3: Apply logical reasoning. The statement is symmetric; if no cats are dogs, no dogs are cats.

- Step 4: Test for validity. The conclusion restates the disjoint nature of the sets, so it is valid.

- Step 5: Check options. Option (1) "Yes" is correct. Option (2) "No" is incorrect. Option (3) "Partially valid" is not applicable. Option (4) "Cannot determine" is incorrect as the conclusion follows.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (1) is correct.
Quick Tip: For "no" statements, check for symmetry in logical conclusions.

- Step 1: Analyze the sentence. "Changed the field forever" implies a significant, positive impact, so the blank requires a positive adjective.

- Step 2: Evaluate options. Option (1) "Trivial" means insignificant, contradicting the impact. Option (2) "Groundbreaking" means innovative and impactful, fitting the context. Option (3) "Temporary" contradicts "forever." Option (4) "Confusing" is negative.

- Step 3: Verify context. "Groundbreaking" aligns with a transformative discovery.

- Step 4: Cross-check. No other option suggests a significant impact.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In sentence completion, ensure the word aligns with the sentence’s implied impact and tone.

- Step 1: Define the word. "Resilient" means able to recover quickly or adapt to challenges.

- Step 2: Compare with options. Option (1) "Fragile" is an antonym, meaning easily broken. Option (2) "Adaptable" aligns with resilience’s ability to adjust. Option (3) "Rigid" means inflexible, opposite to resilient. Option (4) "Weak" is an antonym.

- Step 3: Verify synonym. "Adaptable" captures the ability to adjust, a key aspect of resilience.

- Step 4: Eliminate distractors. Fragile, rigid, and weak do not match.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: For synonyms, choose words that capture the core attribute of the given word.

- Step 1: Identify the opening sentence. Sentence C introduces the entrepreneur and startup, providing context.

- Step 2: Determine the sequence. Sentence B describes the startup’s offerings, following C. Sentence A mentions its growth, expanding on B. Sentence D concludes with investor interest, linking to A.

- Step 3: Test sequence C, B, A, D. C: Entrepreneur founds startup. B: Startup’s solutions. A: Rapid growth. D: Investor interest. This is coherent.

- Step 4: Evaluate options. Option (1) C, A, B, D places growth before solutions, less logical. Option (2) C, B, A, D is logical. Option (3) A, C, B, D starts with growth without context. Option (4) B, C, A, D starts with solutions without introduction.

- Step 5: Verify coherence. C, B, A, D flows naturally.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: In para-jumbles, start with the context-setting sentence and build a logical progression.

- Step 1: Analyze subject-verb agreement. "Children" is plural, requiring a plural verb ("play").

- Step 2: Check verb form. Simple present tense ("play") is appropriate for a general statement.

- Step 3: Evaluate options. Option (1) uses "plays," incorrect for plural subject. Option (2) uses "play," correct. Option (3) uses "is playing," incorrect for plural subject. Option (4) uses "plays" and "parks," incorrect verb and plural noun.

- Step 4: Verify. "The children play" is standard English for plural subjects in simple present tense.

- Step 5: Conclusion. Option (2) is correct.
Quick Tip: Ensure subject-verb agreement matches number (singular/plural) and tense.

- Step 1: Analyze the statement. "Some birds can fly" means there exist birds that can fly.

- Step 2: Evaluate the conclusion. "Some birds cannot fly" means there exist birds that cannot fly.

- Step 3: Apply logical reasoning. The statement does not provide information about whether some birds cannot fly. It only confirms that some can fly, leaving open the possibility that all or some birds cannot fly.

- Step 4: Test for validity. The conclusion is not necessarily true or false based on the statement, as it lacks information about non-flying birds.

- Step 5: Check options. Option (1) "Yes" is incorrect as the conclusion is not guaranteed. Option (2) "No" is incorrect as the conclusion is not disproven. Option (3) "Partially valid" is not applicable. Option (4) "Cannot determine" is correct due to insufficient information.

- Step 6: Conclusion. Option (4) is correct.
Quick Tip: For "some" statements, conclusions about the complementary set require additional information to be valid.