Remarks :
The college management was quite opaque and there was no transparency
Course Curriculum Overview :
The course curriculum was not industry oriented and it hinges upon rote knowledge and the exam structure was mostly driven on theory. Nothing was research driven and it was only cramping up of things at the end and all were the muggers. There was no industrial visits in our college and we had to arrange for the industrial trainings
Placement Experience :
The placement was not that satisfactory and there was no core placement companies leaving one or two. The tentative percentage of students was 30 percent. There so special measure to prepare students for placements
College Events :
There used to an annual cultural fest which used to run for 3 days with all the musical performances and technical fest also used to be held on an annual basis. The management fest never happened but our cultural fest used to be of big mega event which we normally used to wait in a year
Fee Structure And Facilities :
The fee structure was feasible for us but may be not for under privileged. There was no change in fee structure during my course duration. There was no additional fee charges but some people does paid extra donations. There was no transparency in the fee breakdown
Loan/ Scholarship Provisions :
No I did not opt for scholarship and there was no provisioning of scholarship by my college as it was a private institution
Campus Life :
The gender ratio was good in my college and there was substantial girls ratio and it was 10:7. There was hostel parties but day scholars were out of it. There used to gender sensitisation and no political environment as it was a technical college. There was no cultural societies as well
Alumni/Alumna :
Iam not associated with alumni network and don’t have any idea if there exist any alumni network. The seniors in my college was non cooperative and they always remain confined in their own selfs
Admission :
AIEEE rank and then shortlisting and then counselling. I opted for the Bachelor of engineering computer science course because it was in demand and I had keen interest on development and coding exercise. The institution I chose because it was the only best one I had found in my vicinity
Faculty :
Some of the faculty was under qualified and some are upto the mark. The number of lecturer were adequate. Hardly any had any relevant industry experience. The average age of each lecturer was 30 years old and they were young mostly leaving few of them older
Comments