Comprehension

Window onto a Vanishing World: Lahu texts from Thailand

My study of Lahu was carried out during three major fieldtrips in Northern Thailand. These texts, recorded well over half a century ago, reflect a vanished world. It was a time when the forests of Burma and Thailand teemed with game; when “slash-and-burn” agricultural techniques were universal in the hills of Southeast Asia; when animist villages resisted the introduction of missionary Christianity, and religious syncretism was the order of the day; a time before electricity, when people used pine-torches to light their way at night; before young men left the villages to seek work in towns; and, above all, from the linguist’s point of view, a time when the Lahu language was still vibrant in all semantic areas and still relatively free of foreign influences. I was interested in hearing and tape recording Lahu spoken in all kinds of situational contexts, the villagers would talk over various subjects building a house, the stages of cultivating, boar-hunting, crab-gathering, killing a pig for a feast, the institution of the village headman, etc. Then they would actually conduct rehearsals. When they were satisfied, they would signal me to turn on the tape recorder and would proceed with gusto to act out little playlets on the desired topic. Besides this, many items were also collected from individuals, including stories, songs, lectures, and sermons. As a result of this process, which went on for many months.

Question: 1

What is 'Slash and Burn'?

Show Hint

Slash-and-Burn = Swidden Cultivation Shifting Cultivation Jhuming = Traditional Horticultural Agricultural Technique.
Updated On: Sep 4, 2026
  • Tribal warfare
  • Agriculture Technique
  • Traditional Punishment system
  • Mode of traditional hunting
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
In economic anthropology and agrarian archaeology, subsistence modes are classified into foraging, pastoralism, horticulture, and intensive agriculture.
"Slash-and-burn" is an ancient farming method widely practiced in tropical and subtropical hill tracts.
This question asks for the fundamental classification of the slash-and-burn technique mentioned in the passage.

Step 1: Reading and Contextualizing from the Passage:

The passage refers to: "when 'slash-and-burn' agricultural techniques were universal in the hills of Southeast Asia".

Step 2: Anthropological Definition of Slash-and-Burn:

Also known as swidden agriculture or shifting cultivation (Jhum in Northeast India), slash-and-burn is a traditional agricultural technique.
Farmers cut down wild vegetation and forest plots, allow the biomass to dry, and burn it to release nutrient-rich ash into the soil for temporary crop cultivation before moving to a new plot to let the forest regenerate.

Step 3: Final Answer:

Slash-and-burn is an agricultural technique.
Therefore, Option (B) is the correct choice.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

What did the animist villages resisted?

Show Hint

Direct Text Matching:
"animist villages resisted the introduction of missionary Christianity" $\rightarrow$ Option (A).
Updated On: Sep 4, 2026
  • Introduction of Christianity through missionaries
  • Slash-and-burn practice
  • Getting voices tape - recorded by the researcher
  • Conducting rehearsals
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
Indigenous animistic communities often experience religious acculturation and proselytization from external organized religions.
Resistance to foreign religious conversion is a well-documented phenomenon in tribal ethnography.
This question asks what specific external introduction was resisted by the traditional Lahu animist villages according to the passage.

Step 1: Locating Textual Evidence in the Passage:

The passage explicitly describes the socio-religious conditions of the period:
"...when animist villages resisted the introduction of missionary Christianity, and religious syncretism was the order of the day..."

Step 2: Evaluating the Options:

1. Option (A) is correct: The text explicitly identifies "the introduction of missionary Christianity" as what the animist villages resisted.
2. Options (B, C, D): Slash-and-burn was actively practiced (not resisted), and villagers enthusiastically participated in tape-recording and conducting rehearsals for the researcher.

Step 3: Final Answer:

The animist villages resisted the introduction of Christianity through missionaries.
Thus, Option (A) is the correct choice.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

When was this text, "Window into vanishing world" written?

Show Hint

Textual Verification:
Passage states the study occurred when Lahu was "still vibrant in all semantic areas and still relatively free of foreign influences".
Updated On: Sep 4, 2026
  • After all the trekkers and tourist flooded the area
  • After religious syncretism
  • When the areas were still relatively free of foreign influences
  • After the arrival of Christian missionaries
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
Linguistic and ethnographic field research documents cultural realities prior to extensive globalization and language attrition.
This question tests understanding regarding the historical time period when the researcher recorded the Lahu texts.

Step 1: Locating Contextual Clues in the Text:

The author describes the ethnographic baseline:
"...and, above all, from the linguist's point of view, a time when the Lahu language was still vibrant in all semantic areas and still relatively free of foreign influences."

Step 2: Analyzing the Timeline of Fieldwork:

The author explicitly notes that these texts were recorded half a century ago when the indigenous language and culture had not yet been overwhelmed by foreign linguistic loanwords, tourism, or modern urban migrations.
This represents a period when the area was still relatively free of external/foreign influences.

Step 3: Final Answer:

The text reflects the era when the areas were still relatively free of foreign influences.
Therefore, Option (C) is the correct answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

How can you conclude that the writing of the text is an old one that took place half a century ago?

Show Hint

Textual Evidence:
"a time before electricity, when people used pine-torches to light their way at night" demonstrates the historical antiquity of the study.
Updated On: Sep 4, 2026
  • No body remembers the author anymore
  • Traditional agricultural practices were no longer practised
  • Pine-torches were used to light their way at night
  • Religious syncretism had already taken place by then
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
Material culture and infrastructure markers (such as lighting methods and lack of rural electrification) indicate the historical antiquity of ethnographic field accounts.
This question asks to identify the specific historical marker from the passage demonstrating that the account was recorded over fifty years ago.

Step 1: Examining Historical Indicators in the Passage:

The passage details specific material conditions of that era:
"...a time before electricity, when people used pine-torches to light their way at night; before young men left the villages to seek work in towns..."

Step 2: Evaluating the Listed Options:

1. Option (C) is directly supported: The author explicitly mentions the absence of electricity and the use of primitive pine-torches for illumination at night as proof of the past era.
2. Options (A, B, D): The passage does not claim that nobody remembers the author, nor does it state that traditional agriculture had ceased at that time.

Step 3: Final Answer:

The use of pine-torches before the introduction of electricity confirms the historical antiquity of the ethnographic setting.
Hence, Option (C) is the correct choice.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

"A time when the Lahu language was still vibrant in all semantic areas".
Which of the following is not related to that 'Time'?

Show Hint

Negative Question Strategy:
Options (A), (C), and (D) are verbatim characteristics of the author's fieldwork era. Option (B) contradicts the text's emphasis on freedom from foreign languages.
Updated On: Sep 4, 2026
  • The time before electricity
  • The time when villagers who have learned English and other languages return to the village
  • Before men left the villages to seek work in towns
  • The time when animist villages resisted the introduction of Christianity
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
Linguistic vitality flourishes when an indigenous community remains relatively isolated from dominant national and foreign languages.
This question asks to identify the condition that was NOT part of the historical timeframe described by the author.

Step 1: Reviewing Features of 'That Time' from the Passage:

The passage explicitly lists the characteristics defining that historical period:
1. "a time before electricity..." (Corresponds to Option A)
2. "before young men left the villages to seek work in towns..." (Corresponds to Option C)
3. "when animist villages resisted the introduction of missionary Christianity..." (Corresponds to Option D)

Step 2: Identifying the Unrelated/Contradictory Condition:

Option (B) mentions a time when villagers returned after learning English and other foreign languages.
This scenario represents modern linguistic contact and foreign influence, which directly contradicts the author's statement that the Lahu language was "still vibrant in all semantic areas and still relatively free of foreign influences".

Step 3: Final Answer:

Option (B) is not related to the historical time described in the passage.
Therefore, Option (B) is the correct answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0