The Chick Martin test is a classical method used to evaluate the efficacy of disinfectants in the presence of organic matter (e.g., yeast, proteins).
It improves upon the Rideal–Walker test by simulating more realistic conditions found in clinical and environmental settings.
This test involves the comparison of phenol coefficient of a disinfectant in the presence of organic load.
Widal test — Used for serological diagnosis of typhoid fever, not for disinfectants.
VRDL test — Refers to Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory tests for viral infections like HIV, hepatitis, etc.
Hence, both (A) and (B) are unrelated to disinfectant evaluation.
The question asks which test is used to check how well a disinfectant works. Let's look at each option:
Widal and VRDL both test for antibodies in human blood samples and belong to diagnostic microbiology, while the Chick Martin test belongs to a completely different area, disinfectant efficacy testing, which directly answers what the question is asking.
So the correct answer is Chick Martin test.
List I | List II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | \(\Omega^{-1}\) | I | Specific conductance |
| B | \(∧\) | II | Electrical conductance |
| C | k | III | Specific resistance |
| D | \(\rho\) | IV | Equivalent conductance |
List I | List II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Constant heat (q = 0) | I | Isothermal |
| B | Reversible process at constant temperature (dT = 0) | II | Isometric |
| C | Constant volume (dV = 0) | III | Adiabatic |
| D | Constant pressure (dP = 0) | IV | Isobar |
List I | List II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | \(\Omega^{-1}\) | I | Specific conductance |
| B | \(∧\) | II | Electrical conductance |
| C | k | III | Specific resistance |
| D | \(\rho\) | IV | Equivalent conductance |
List I | List II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Constant heat (q = 0) | I | Isothermal |
| B | Reversible process at constant temperature (dT = 0) | II | Isometric |
| C | Constant volume (dV = 0) | III | Adiabatic |
| D | Constant pressure (dP = 0) | IV | Isobar |