Comprehension
Read the passage and answer the questions:
Constitution: Welcoming the Objectives Resolution
“As an Adibasi, I am not expected to understand the legal intricacies of the Resolution, But my common sense tells me that every one of us should march in that road to freedom and fight together. Sir, if there is any group of Indian people that has been shabbily treated it is my people. They have been disgracefully treated, neglected for the last 6,000 years. ... The whole history of my people is one of continuous exploitation and dispossession by the non-aboriginals of India punctuated by rebellions and disorder, and yet I take Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru at his word. I take you all at your word that now we are going to start a new chapter, a new chapter of independent India where there is equality of opportunity, where no one would be neglected.”
Singh spoke eloquently on the need to protect the tribes, and ensure conditions that could help them come up to the level of the general population. Tribes were not a numerical minority, he argued, but they needed protection. They had been dispossessed of the land they had settled, deprived of their forests and pastures, and forced to move in search of new homes. Perceiving them as primitive and backward, the rest of society had turned away from them, spurned them. He made a moving plea for breaking the emotional and physical distance that separated the tribals from the rest of society: “Our point is that you have got to mix with us. We are willing to mix with you ...”. Singh was not asking for separate electorates, but he felt that reservation of seats in the legislature was essential to allow tribals to represent themselves. It would be a way, he said, of compelling others to hear the voice of tribals, and come near them.
Question: 1

Identify the speaker of this passage:

Show Hint

Whenever a Constituent Assembly passage discusses Adivasis, tribal dispossession, forests, and political safeguards, consider Jaipal Singh.
Jaipal Singh strongly advocated representation and constitutional protection for tribal communities.
Remember that he supported reservation of legislative seats rather than separate electorates for tribals.
Updated On: Sep 14, 2026
  • Jawaharlal Nehru
  • Vallabhbhai Patel
  • Jaipal Singh
  • Govind Ballabh Pant
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
The passage comes from the debates surrounding the Objectives Resolution in the Constituent Assembly and focuses on the political representation and protection of tribal communities.
The speaker identifies himself explicitly as an Adibasi and discusses the historical exploitation, dispossession, and marginalisation of tribal people.

Step 1: Identifying the Speaker from the Content:

The speaker repeatedly refers to “my people” and explains the experience of tribal communities in India.
He argues that the tribes had been dispossessed of their lands, forests, and pastures and had suffered neglect for generations.
This indicates that the speaker was himself an important representative of tribal interests.

Step 2: Understanding Jaipal Singh's Role:

Jaipal Singh was a prominent tribal leader and a member of the Constituent Assembly.
He represented the interests of Adivasi communities and strongly advocated political safeguards and representation for tribal people.
His speeches in the Constituent Assembly emphasised equality, dignity, and protection against historical marginalisation.

Step 3: Interpreting the Demand for Representation:

The speaker specifically rejects separate electorates but argues for reservation of seats in legislatures.
This demand was intended to ensure that tribal communities would have representatives who could articulate their interests within the constitutional system.
The argument reflects Jaipal Singh's approach to tribal political representation.

Step 4: Eliminating the Other Options:

Jawaharlal Nehru was the principal mover of the Objectives Resolution but was not the tribal leader speaking in this passage.
Vallabhbhai Patel was a major member of the Constituent Assembly and handled several important constitutional and administrative matters, but he was not the speaker described here.
Govind Ballabh Pant was another prominent Congress leader but does not fit the passage's identity and tribal advocacy.
Final Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is (C) Jaipal Singh.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which social group is the subject of concern to the speaker?

Show Hint

Look for the speaker's repeated references to “Adibasi”, “tribes”, forests, pastures, and tribal representation.
These keywords directly identify the group as tribal people.
In comprehension questions, explicit terms in the passage should be prioritised over broader historical associations.
Updated On: Sep 14, 2026
  • Working Class
  • Religious Minorities
  • Tribal People
  • Farmers
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
This question is directly based on the passage concerning Jaipal Singh's intervention in the Constituent Assembly.
The central theme of the passage is the historical treatment of tribal communities and the need to ensure their protection, representation, and integration into independent India.

Step 1: Identifying the Speaker's Main Concern:

The speaker begins by identifying himself as an Adibasi and then refers to “my people”.
He describes their long history of exploitation and dispossession and emphasises that they had been neglected by the wider society.
This immediately establishes the social group that forms the focus of his argument.

Step 2: Examining the Specific Grievances:

The passage states that tribal people had been dispossessed of the lands where they had settled.
They had also been deprived of forests and pastures and forced to move in search of new homes.
The speaker further explains that society had regarded them as primitive and backward and had maintained both emotional and physical distance from them.

Step 3: Understanding the Proposed Safeguards:

The speaker argues that the tribes required protection even though he did not regard them simply as a numerical minority.
He advocated reservation of legislative seats so that tribal representatives could make their voices heard within the constitutional system.
This confirms that the central concern was the political and social position of tribal communities.

Step 4: Eliminating the Other Options:

The working class is not the principal subject of the passage.
Religious minorities are also not the group being discussed.
Although farmers could experience land-related problems, the passage specifically discusses Adivasi communities and their historical dispossession.
Final Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is (C) Tribal People.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

According to the speaker, the whole history of his people is one of:

Show Hint

This is a direct passage-based question, so identify the sentence that answers the question rather than relying only on general knowledge.
The keywords are “continuous exploitation” and “dispossession”.
Options describing prosperity, modern advancement, or global isolation contradict the passage.
Updated On: Sep 14, 2026
  • Prosperity and development by the aboriginals of India
  • Continuous exploitation and dispossession by the non-aboriginals of India
  • Ignorance and isolation from the global network
  • Modern education and social advancement in all sectors
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
This is a direct comprehension question based on the speaker's description of the historical experience of tribal communities.
The speaker presents a critical account of the treatment of his people and connects their historical difficulties with exploitation, dispossession, and political and social marginalisation.

Step 1: Identifying the Relevant Statement:

The speaker states that the whole history of his people had been one of continuous exploitation and dispossession by non-aboriginals of India.
This sentence directly provides the answer to the question.
Therefore, there is no need to infer an alternative historical interpretation.

Step 2: Understanding Exploitation:

The speaker refers to the long-term exploitation of tribal communities by groups from outside their traditional social and geographical environments.
This exploitation affected their economic and social position and contributed to their marginalisation.
The passage therefore presents tribal history through the experience of loss and dispossession.

Step 3: Understanding Dispossession:

The passage later explains that tribal people had been deprived of lands where they had settled, as well as forests and pastures on which their communities depended.
They were consequently forced to move in search of new homes.
These details reinforce the meaning of the statement about continuous dispossession.

Step 4: Evaluating the Options:

Option (A) is the opposite of the speaker's description because he emphasises exploitation rather than prosperity.
Option (C) introduces global isolation, which is not the historical claim made in the passage.
Option (D) describes modern advancement and education, which again contradicts the speaker's emphasis on long-term marginalisation.
Option (B) reproduces the central historical claim made by the speaker.
Final Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) Continuous exploitation and dispossession by the non-aboriginals of India.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

The need for protection of the “forest dwellers” is necessitated by which reasons? Identify the correct statements.
A. They had been dispossessed of the land they had settled.
B. Perceiving them as primitive and backward.
C. The rest of society had turned away from them.
D. Deprived of their forests and pastures.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Show Hint

For statement-based comprehension questions, check each statement against the passage separately.
Here, all four statements are explicitly supported by the speaker's discussion of tribal dispossession and social exclusion.
When every statement is supported, select the “all statements” combination if it is provided.
Updated On: Sep 14, 2026
  • A, B and D only
  • A, B and C only
  • A, B, C and D
  • B, C and D only
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
The passage explains why Jaipal Singh believed that tribal communities required constitutional and social protection.
He identifies several interconnected forms of disadvantage, including loss of land and natural resources, social prejudice, and exclusion from wider society.

Step 1: Examining Statement A:

The speaker states that tribal people had been dispossessed of the land they had settled.
Loss of land directly affected their economic security, social stability, and ability to maintain their established communities.
Therefore, statement A is correct.

Step 2: Examining Statement B:

The passage states that tribal people were perceived as primitive and backward by the rest of society.
Such perceptions contributed to discrimination and social exclusion.
The speaker presents this negative social attitude as one of the reasons why greater protection was necessary.
Therefore, statement B is correct.

Step 3: Examining Statement C:

The speaker explicitly states that the rest of society had turned away from tribal people and had spurned them.
He therefore called for the emotional and physical distance separating tribal communities from the rest of society to be overcome.
Thus, statement C is correct.

Step 4: Examining Statement D:

The passage also explains that tribal people had been deprived of their forests and pastures.
These resources were important for their livelihood and way of life.
Therefore, statement D is also correct.

Step 5: Final Evaluation:

All four statements are supported by the passage.
The speaker's argument for protection rests on economic dispossession, loss of natural resources, social prejudice, and exclusion from the wider society.
Final Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is (C) A, B, C and D.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

What measure was suggested by the speaker for breaking the emotional and physical distance that separated the tribals from the rest of society?

Show Hint

The most important distinction is between reservation and separate electorates.
Jaipal Singh supported reservation of legislative seats for tribal representation but did not demand separate electorates.
Remember that the purpose was to ensure that the voice of tribal communities would be heard within the constitutional system.
Updated On: Sep 14, 2026
  • Reservation of seats in the legislature for the tribals
  • Separate electorates for the tribals
  • Development of modern education
  • Establishment of special department for tribals
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Concept:
The passage discusses Jaipal Singh's argument that tribal communities needed political representation and social integration in independent India.
He rejected the idea of separate electorates but supported legislative reservation as a mechanism through which tribal people could ensure that their voices were heard.

Step 1: Understanding the Problem of Distance:

The speaker describes an emotional and physical distance between tribal communities and the rest of Indian society.
This distance had developed through long-term social exclusion, prejudice, and the perception of tribal people as primitive or backward.
He therefore sought a mechanism that would bring tribal concerns into the political and constitutional mainstream.

Step 2: Examining the Proposal for Representation:

The speaker explicitly states that he was not asking for separate electorates.
Instead, he argued that reservation of seats in the legislature was essential to allow tribals to represent themselves.
This would ensure that elected institutions could hear the concerns of tribal communities directly.

Step 3: Understanding the Purpose of Reservation:

According to the speaker, reserved representation would compel others to hear the voice of tribal people and come closer to them.
Thus, reservation was not presented merely as an electoral arrangement but as a means of reducing political and social distance.
It would give tribal communities a formal voice within the institutions of independent India.

Step 4: Evaluating the Other Options:

Separate electorates are specifically rejected by the speaker, making option (B) incorrect.
Although education could contribute to social development, the specific constitutional measure suggested in the passage is not modern education.
The establishment of a special department is also not identified as the proposed measure.
Final Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is (A) Reservation of seats in the legislature for the tribals.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0