Comprehension
In 1973, only 45 of the world's 151 countries were counted as 'free' by Freedom House, a nongovernmental organization that produces quantitative measures of civil and political rights for countries around the world. The following generation saw momentous political change, with democracies and market-oriented economies spreading in virtually every part of the world except for the Arab Middle East. This transformation was Samuel Huntington’s third wave of democratization: liberal democracy as the default form of government became part of the accepted political landscape at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
Underlying these changes in political systems was a massive social transformation as well. The shift to democracy was a result of millions of formerly passive individuals around the world organizing themselves and participating in the political life of their societies. This social mobilization was driven by a host of factors: greatly expanded access to education that made people more aware of themselves and the political world around them; information technology, which facilitated the rapid spread of ideas and knowledge; cheap travel and communications that allowed people to vote with their feet if they didn’t like their government; and greater prosperity, which induced people to demand better protection of their rights.
The third wave crested after the late 1990s; however, a ‘democratic recession’ emerged in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Approximately one in five countries that had been part of the third wave either reverted to authoritarianism or saw a significant erosion of democratic institutions. Freedom House noted that 2009 marked the fourth consecutive year in which freedom had declined around the world, the first time this had happened since it established its measures of freedom in 1973. [279 words]
[Extracted from The Origins of Political Order by Francis Fukuyama]
Underlying these changes in political systems was a massive social transformation as well. The shift to democracy was a result of millions of formerly passive individuals around the world organizing themselves and participating in the political life of their societies. This social mobilization was driven by a host of factors: greatly expanded access to education that made people more aware of themselves and the political world around them; information technology, which facilitated the rapid spread of ideas and knowledge; cheap travel and communications that allowed people to vote with their feet if they didn’t like their government; and greater prosperity, which induced people to demand better protection of their rights.
The third wave crested after the late 1990s; however, a ‘democratic recession’ emerged in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Approximately one in five countries that had been part of the third wave either reverted to authoritarianism or saw a significant erosion of democratic institutions. Freedom House noted that 2009 marked the fourth consecutive year in which freedom had declined around the world, the first time this had happened since it established its measures of freedom in 1973. [279 words]
[Extracted from The Origins of Political Order by Francis Fukuyama]
Question: 1
Which of the following aspects is most critical in understanding Freedom House's evaluation process?
Which of the following aspects is most critical in understanding Freedom House's evaluation process?
Show Hint
Whenever a passage stresses “quantitative measures,” the answer usually relates to methodology or measurement.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
- The methodology by which it quantifies the relative freedoms in different political systems
- Its emphasis on electoral participation and voter turnout in measuring democracy
- Its role in advising governments on democratic reforms
- Its primary focus on economic disparities within democracies
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
The passage states that Freedom House “produces quantitative measures of civil and political rights.”
Thus, understanding its methodology of quantifying freedoms is the key.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Elimination Approach:
Option 2 (electoral participation) is never discussed, the passage only mentions civil and political rights, not voter turnout specifically. Option 3 (advising governments) is not stated anywhere, Freedom House only measures and reports. Option 4 (economic disparities) is also absent from the definition given.
Only option 1 survives, since the passage defines Freedom House by what it does: it produces quantitative measures of civil and political rights, which is its methodology of quantification.
Option 2 (electoral participation) is never discussed, the passage only mentions civil and political rights, not voter turnout specifically. Option 3 (advising governments) is not stated anywhere, Freedom House only measures and reports. Option 4 (economic disparities) is also absent from the definition given.
Only option 1 survives, since the passage defines Freedom House by what it does: it produces quantitative measures of civil and political rights, which is its methodology of quantification.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
The question is asking what matters most for understanding how Freedom House does its evaluation, so each option needs to be checked against the one sentence in the passage that actually describes the organisation.
- The methodology by which it quantifies the relative freedoms in different political systems: the passage defines Freedom House as a body that 'produces quantitative measures of civil and political rights for countries around the world.' That is a description of a method, turning freedom into a number, so understanding that quantifying methodology is exactly what it takes to understand how the organisation evaluates countries.
- Its emphasis on electoral participation and voter turnout in measuring democracy: this sounds reasonable because elections are commonly linked to democracy, but the passage never says Freedom House measures turnout specifically, it speaks generally of civil and political rights, which is broader than voting statistics alone.
- Its role in advising governments on democratic reforms: this describes an active, advisory function, but the passage only says Freedom House 'produces measures,' meaning it observes and reports, it gives no indication that it advises or intervenes in policy.
- Its primary focus on economic disparities within democracies: economic inequality is a separate topic from civil and political rights, and the passage does not connect Freedom House's work to income or wealth gaps at all.
Since the passage's only real description of Freedom House is that it quantifies civil and political rights, the option about its measuring methodology is the one actually grounded in the text.
So the correct answer is The methodology by which it quantifies the relative freedoms in different political systems.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
What does the phrase “vote with their feet” imply in the context of the passage?
What does the phrase “vote with their feet” imply in the context of the passage?
Show Hint
“Vote with their feet” almost always means migration to express political preference.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
- Participating in electoral processes
- Public protests expressing dissatisfaction
- Migrating to other countries with better governance
- Joining local government reform initiatives
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The passage explains this in context: improved travel and communication allowed people to “vote with their feet if they didn't like their government”, meaning they could move elsewhere.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Idiom-based Approach:
To vote with one's feet is a common English idiom meaning to express a preference through action rather than a ballot, usually by leaving a place instead of staying to campaign for change.
Applying this general meaning to the passage's context, cheap travel and communication meant dissatisfied citizens could simply leave for a country with better governance rather than fight for reform at home. This matches option 3, migrating to other countries.
To vote with one's feet is a common English idiom meaning to express a preference through action rather than a ballot, usually by leaving a place instead of staying to campaign for change.
Applying this general meaning to the passage's context, cheap travel and communication meant dissatisfied citizens could simply leave for a country with better governance rather than fight for reform at home. This matches option 3, migrating to other countries.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
The phrase sits inside a specific sentence about travel and communication, so the right option has to fit that sentence's context, not just sound related to political dissatisfaction in general.
- Participating in electoral processes: voting in an election is the literal opposite of what 'voting with feet' means, the idiom describes acting instead of casting a ballot, so this option misreads the phrase as literal voting.
- Public protests expressing dissatisfaction: protesting is a way of staying and pushing for change, but the sentence is about cheap travel letting people go elsewhere, not about demonstrating in place.
- Migrating to other countries with better governance: the sentence links this phrase directly to 'cheap travel and communications,' which enabled people to leave a country whose government they disliked. Leaving physically, using one's feet, for a place with better governance is exactly what the sentence is describing.
- Joining local government reform initiatives: reform work means staying and trying to fix the system from inside, which is the opposite of the exit the idiom describes.
Because the surrounding sentence ties the phrase to travel and leaving a disliked government, only the migration option matches its actual context.
So the correct answer is Migrating to other countries with better governance.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
The term 'third wave of democratization' as used in the passage refers to:
The term 'third wave of democratization' as used in the passage refers to:
Show Hint
Associate Huntington’s “third wave” with global democratization post-1970s.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
- Rise of communism in Eastern Europe
- Spread of democracy and market-oriented economies
- Decline of authoritarian regimes in the 1960s
- Global civil rights movements
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
The passage attributes the transformation to Samuel Huntington’s third wave of democratization, marked by the spread of democracies and market-oriented economies in almost all parts of the world.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Contextual Approach:
Samuel Huntington's waves of democratization is a well-known political science framework describing periods when many countries shifted from authoritarian to democratic rule. The first wave was in the 19th century, the second after World War II, and the third began in the mid-1970s and continued through the late 20th century.
The passage places this third wave right after describing democracies and market-oriented economies spreading in virtually every part of the world, confirming option 2 as the correct description, not communism, not 1960s authoritarian decline, and not civil rights movements specifically.
Samuel Huntington's waves of democratization is a well-known political science framework describing periods when many countries shifted from authoritarian to democratic rule. The first wave was in the 19th century, the second after World War II, and the third began in the mid-1970s and continued through the late 20th century.
The passage places this third wave right after describing democracies and market-oriented economies spreading in virtually every part of the world, confirming option 2 as the correct description, not communism, not 1960s authoritarian decline, and not civil rights movements specifically.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
The word 'this' in 'this transformation was Samuel Huntington's third wave of democratization' refers back to something specific, so finding what 'this' points to settles the question.
- Rise of communism in Eastern Europe: the passage describes democracies and market economies spreading, which is the opposite direction of a communist rise, so this option contradicts the sentence it is meant to explain.
- Spread of democracy and market-oriented economies: this is the exact transformation described immediately before the term is introduced, 'democracies and market-oriented economies spreading in virtually every part of the world.' The term 'third wave of democratization' is simply the passage's label for this spread.
- Decline of authoritarian regimes in the 1960s: the passage's timeframe is the generation after 1973, not the 1960s, and it never singles out authoritarian decline as a separate event from the wider spread of democracy.
- Global civil rights movements: civil rights movements are never mentioned in the passage, this option introduces a topic the text does not raise.
Tracing 'this transformation' back to what it describes shows it is the spread of democratic, market-based systems worldwide, matching only the second option.
So the correct answer is Spread of democracy and market-oriented economies.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
Which of the following was NOT mentioned as a factor contributing to social mobilization and the shift to democracy?
Which of the following was NOT mentioned as a factor contributing to social mobilization and the shift to democracy?
Show Hint
Process of elimination works well—identify factors explicitly mentioned in the passage.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
- Increased access to education
- Expanding information technology
- Heightened global military presence
- Greater prosperity
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The passage lists factors driving social mobilization:
- expanded education
- information technology
- travel and communication
- greater prosperity
It does not mention military presence.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Elimination Approach:
Checking each option against the passage: education is mentioned (expanded access to education), information technology is mentioned, greater prosperity is mentioned. Travel and communication are also mentioned, though not listed as an option here.
Heightened global military presence appears nowhere in the passage's list of drivers, making option 3 the one NOT mentioned.
Checking each option against the passage: education is mentioned (expanded access to education), information technology is mentioned, greater prosperity is mentioned. Travel and communication are also mentioned, though not listed as an option here.
Heightened global military presence appears nowhere in the passage's list of drivers, making option 3 the one NOT mentioned.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
This is a NOT question, so the task is to check each option against the passage's list of drivers and find the one item that is missing from that list.
- Increased access to education: the passage names 'greatly expanded access to education that made people more aware of themselves and the political world around them' as a driver, so this one is present.
- Expanding information technology: the passage names 'information technology, which facilitated the rapid spread of ideas and knowledge,' so this one is also present.
- Heightened global military presence: the passage's list covers education, technology, travel and communication, and prosperity, nowhere does it mention military presence as a cause of people becoming politically active. This factor simply does not appear.
- Greater prosperity: the passage names 'greater prosperity, which induced people to demand better protection of their rights,' so this one is present too.
Since three of the four options are directly quoted in the passage and one is not, the missing factor, military presence, is the one the question is asking for.
So the correct answer is Heightened global military presence.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
According to the passage, when was the first time that freedom had declined around the world?
According to the passage, when was the first time that freedom had declined around the world?
Show Hint
Pay attention to comparative qualifiers like “first time,” “since,” or “ever”—they pinpoint timeline-based answers.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
- 1973
- 1990
- 2006
- 2009
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The passage states:
“Freedom House noted that 2009 marked the fourth consecutive year in which freedom had declined around the world, the first time this had happened since it established its measures of freedom in 1973.”
Thus, the first recorded global decline occurred in 2009.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Reasoning Approach:
1973 is the year Freedom House began measuring freedom, it is a starting point, not a decline. The other two options, 1990 and 2006, are not mentioned in the passage at all.
The passage explicitly says 2009 was the first time a four-year consecutive decline had happened since records began in 1973. So the year of that first recorded decline is 2009, option 4.
1973 is the year Freedom House began measuring freedom, it is a starting point, not a decline. The other two options, 1990 and 2006, are not mentioned in the passage at all.
The passage explicitly says 2009 was the first time a four-year consecutive decline had happened since records began in 1973. So the year of that first recorded decline is 2009, option 4.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
This question is a direct lookup, but each option still deserves a check against what role, if any, that year plays in the passage.
- 1973: this is the year Freedom House 'established its measures of freedom,' a starting point for its records, not a year of decline.
- 1990: this year does not appear anywhere in the passage.
- 2006: this year also does not appear anywhere in the passage.
- 2009: the passage states plainly that '2009 marked the fourth consecutive year in which freedom had declined around the world, the first time this had happened since it established its measures of freedom in 1973.' That sentence directly names 2009 as the first recorded instance of this kind of decline.
Only one of the four years is actually tied to a decline in the passage, the other three either mark a different kind of milestone or are not mentioned at all.
So the correct answer is 2009.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions