To analyze the given statements, let's examine the assertion and the reason:
Explanation:
Since magnetic field lines do indeed form closed loops, they corroborate the statement that isolated monopoles do not exist. The non-existence of magnetic monopoles is therefore a direct consequence of the nature of magnetic field lines, which are continuous and do not terminate on a monopole.
Conclusion: The assertion that magnetic monopoles do not exist is correct, and the reason that magnetic field lines form closed loops supports this assertion. Thus, both statements are correct, and the reason given is indeed the correct explanation of the assertion.
Therefore, the correct option is: Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

An infinitely long straight wire carrying current $I$ is bent in a planar shape as shown in the diagram. The radius of the circular part is $r$. The magnetic field at the centre $O$ of the circular loop is :


The relationship between the magnetic susceptibility $ \chi $ and the magnetic permeability $ \mu $ is given by:
$ \mu_0 $ is the permeability of free space and $ \mu_r $ is relative permeability.
Given below are two statements : one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R.
Assertion A : If oxygen ion (O\(^{-2}\)) and Hydrogen ion (H\(^{+}\)) enter normal to the magnetic field with equal momentum, then the path of O\(^{-2}\) ion has a smaller curvature than that of H\(^{+}\).
Reason R : A proton with same linear momentum as an electron will form a path of smaller radius of curvature on entering a uniform magnetic field perpendicularly.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below

Foot of perpendicular from origin on a line passing through $(1, 1, 1)$ having direction ratios $\langle 2, 3, 4 \rangle$, is:
A line through $(1, 1, 1)$ and perpendicular to both $\hat{i} + 2\hat{j} + 2\hat{k}$ and $2\hat{i} + 2\hat{j} + \hat{k}$, let $(a, b, c)$ be foot of perpendicular from origin then $34 (a + b + c)$ is: