The question involves evaluating the relationship between the assertion and reason provided, both of which pertain to periodic trends in the covalent radius of elements down a group in the periodic table. To answer this, we need to examine the concepts involved.
Thus, the correct response is that while both statements are true, the reason does not adequately explain the assertion.
Step 1. Analyze the Assertion (A): The increase in covalent radius from N to P is significant due to additional electron shells. However, from A to B, the increase in size is smaller because of the presence of poor shielding by d- and f-electrons.
Step 2. Analyze the Reason (R): The statement in (R) is generally true as covalent and ionic radii tend to increase down the group in the periodic table. However, this reason does not specifically explain the smaller increase observed from A to B.
Step 3. Conclusion: Although both statements are individually true, the reason provided does not correctly explain the observed trend in covalent radii from A to B.
What will be the equilibrium constant of the given reaction carried out in a \(5 \,L\) vessel and having equilibrium amounts of \(A_2\) and \(A\) as \(0.5\) mole and \(2 \times 10^{-6}\) mole respectively?
The reaction : \(A_2 \rightleftharpoons 2A\)
Which of the following Statements are NOT true about the periodic table?
A. The properties of elements are a function of atomic weights.
B. The properties of elements are a function of atomic numbers.
C. Elements having similar outer electronic configuration are arranged in the same period.
D. An element's location reflects the quantum numbers of the last filled orbital.
E. The number of elements in a period is the same as the number of atomic orbitals available in the energy level that is being filled.
