Comprehension
As a result of FIFA’s restrictions on players wearing [1] rainbow armbands during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, the German Football Association (DFB) has taken the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). In a protest against FIFA’s rule regarding the armband meant to support the [2] community, the German players covered their lips in a team picture taken before their 2-1 defeat to Japan.
On Wednesday, Germany played against Japan. Before the game, FIFA warned the DFB of “severe” athletic fines if they breached tournament regulations by allowing their captain to wear the [1] armband, which promotes diversity and inclusion. The DFB told German captain Manuel Neuer not to wear the rainbow armband during the game.
If CAS rules quickly against the suspension’s legality, Neuer might continue to wear the captain’s armband for Germany’s next game against Spain on Sunday. CAS has set up a special ad hoc branch for this World Cup to ensure that applications are processed within 48 hours. Germany’s players protested by covering their lips as they sought to wear the rainbow armband during their team’s dramatic 2-1 defeat to Japan at the Khalifa Stadium.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “World Cup 2022: Germany’s players cover mouths during team photo to protest FIFA’s rainbow armband rule”, The Economic Times]
On Wednesday, Germany played against Japan. Before the game, FIFA warned the DFB of “severe” athletic fines if they breached tournament regulations by allowing their captain to wear the [1] armband, which promotes diversity and inclusion. The DFB told German captain Manuel Neuer not to wear the rainbow armband during the game.
If CAS rules quickly against the suspension’s legality, Neuer might continue to wear the captain’s armband for Germany’s next game against Spain on Sunday. CAS has set up a special ad hoc branch for this World Cup to ensure that applications are processed within 48 hours. Germany’s players protested by covering their lips as they sought to wear the rainbow armband during their team’s dramatic 2-1 defeat to Japan at the Khalifa Stadium.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “World Cup 2022: Germany’s players cover mouths during team photo to protest FIFA’s rainbow armband rule”, The Economic Times]
Question: 1
What is the name of the armband which has been replaced with ``[1]'' in the passage above?
What is the name of the armband which has been replaced with ``[1]'' in the passage above?
Show Hint
When a blank [1] references a specific branded campaign, match with the official name used in news reports rather than a generic term.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- FreeLove
- OneLove
- Pride
- PlayLove
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Use the passage cues).
The armband is described as a rainbow captain’s armband “which promotes diversity and inclusion,” and whose use drew FIFA warnings at the Qatar 2022 World Cup.
Step 2 (Recall the event).
European teams planned the OneLove armband (heart with rainbow colours) as a pro-inclusion symbol; FIFA threatened sanctions, prompting protests like Germany’s “hands-over-mouth” photo.
Step 3 (Eliminate distractors).
“FreeLove,” “PlayLove,” and generic “Pride” are not the official campaign names in this context.
\[ \boxed{\text{(B) OneLove}} \]
The armband is described as a rainbow captain’s armband “which promotes diversity and inclusion,” and whose use drew FIFA warnings at the Qatar 2022 World Cup.
Step 2 (Recall the event).
European teams planned the OneLove armband (heart with rainbow colours) as a pro-inclusion symbol; FIFA threatened sanctions, prompting protests like Germany’s “hands-over-mouth” photo.
Step 3 (Eliminate distractors).
“FreeLove,” “PlayLove,” and generic “Pride” are not the official campaign names in this context.
\[ \boxed{\text{(B) OneLove}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The passage describes a rainbow coloured captain's armband that promotes diversity and inclusion, which FIFA restricted at the 2022 World Cup and which several European teams, including Germany, wanted to wear. We need to identify the actual name of that campaign.
- FreeLove: This name is not associated with any campaign at the 2022 World Cup. It sounds similar to the real name but is not the term used by the teams or in news coverage of the event.
- OneLove: The OneLove armband, a heart shaped design combining several colours including the rainbow, was organised as a joint campaign by several European football federations to promote inclusion. FIFA's threat of sporting sanctions against captains who wore it led directly to protests such as Germany's players covering their mouths for a team photo.
- Pride: "Pride" is a general term widely used for LGBTQ+ visibility and celebration, such as Pride marches, but it was not the specific name FIFA and the participating football associations used for this particular armband campaign.
- PlayLove: Like FreeLove, this name does not match any known campaign from the 2022 World Cup and appears designed only to sound similar to the real answer.
News coverage of the Qatar World Cup, including the events described in the passage, consistently refers to this campaign by one specific name.
Therefore, the correct answer is OneLove.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
The name of which community has been replaced with ``[2]'' in the passage above?
The name of which community has been replaced with ``[2]'' in the passage above?
Show Hint
Rainbow symbolism in global sports headlines nearly always points to LGBTQ+ inclusion campaigns.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Kurdish
- Rohingya
- Uyghur
- LGBTQ+
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Read the context).
The armband “promotes diversity and inclusion” and is explicitly called a “rainbow armband,” a widely recognised symbol of LGBTQ+ rights.
Step 2 (Rule out others).
Kurdish, Rohingya, and Uyghur denote ethnic groups; the armband controversy concerns sexual orientation/gender identity inclusion.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) LGBTQ+}} \]
The armband “promotes diversity and inclusion” and is explicitly called a “rainbow armband,” a widely recognised symbol of LGBTQ+ rights.
Step 2 (Rule out others).
Kurdish, Rohingya, and Uyghur denote ethnic groups; the armband controversy concerns sexual orientation/gender identity inclusion.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) LGBTQ+}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The passage says the armband was meant to support a community, and it repeatedly calls the armband a "rainbow" armband that "promotes diversity and inclusion". We need to identify which community that rainbow symbolism points to.
- Kurdish: The Kurdish people are an ethnic group spread across parts of the Middle East. Their identity and struggles are not connected to rainbow symbolism or this particular armband campaign.
- Rohingya: The Rohingya are a Muslim ethnic minority from Myanmar who have faced severe persecution. Their situation, while a serious human rights issue in its own right, has no link to the rainbow armband described here.
- Uyghur: The Uyghurs are a Turkic ethnic group, largely Muslim, based mainly in China's Xinjiang region. Like the other two ethnic groups listed, they are unrelated to the rainbow symbolism in the passage.
- LGBTQ+: The rainbow flag and rainbow colours are the internationally recognised symbol of the LGBTQ+ community, representing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minorities. An armband described as a rainbow armband promoting "diversity and inclusion" fits this community directly.
Kurdish, Rohingya, and Uyghur are all ethnic or religious groups facing their own distinct issues, none tied to rainbow imagery, while the rainbow symbol is specifically and widely associated with LGBTQ+ rights.
Therefore, the correct answer is LGBTQ+.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
What is the name of the system used to monitor and regulate migrant labourers, which is used in Qatar and a few other countries, and which came under heavy criticism in the build-up to the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar?
What is the name of the system used to monitor and regulate migrant labourers, which is used in Qatar and a few other countries, and which came under heavy criticism in the build-up to the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar?
Show Hint
Link “migrant labour controversy in Gulf states” with the keyword Kafala.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Iddat
- Khalifa
- Kafala
- Jazeera
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Identify the term).
The Kafala (sponsorship) system ties a migrant worker’s legal status to an employer/sponsor; it faced global criticism regarding workers’ rights in Gulf countries, including Qatar.
Step 2 (Eliminate distractors).
Iddat is an Islamic legal waiting period; Khalifa is a ruling title/name and also the name of a stadium; Jazeera is a media network—none denote the labour system.
\[ \boxed{\text{(C) Kafala}} \]
The Kafala (sponsorship) system ties a migrant worker’s legal status to an employer/sponsor; it faced global criticism regarding workers’ rights in Gulf countries, including Qatar.
Step 2 (Eliminate distractors).
Iddat is an Islamic legal waiting period; Khalifa is a ruling title/name and also the name of a stadium; Jazeera is a media network—none denote the labour system.
\[ \boxed{\text{(C) Kafala}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks for the name of the system used in Qatar and some other countries to monitor and regulate migrant labourers, which drew heavy criticism ahead of the 2022 World Cup. Let's examine each option.
- Iddat: Iddat is a term from Islamic personal law referring to a waiting period a woman observes after divorce or the death of her husband before she can remarry. It has nothing to do with labour migration.
- Khalifa: Khalifa is a title historically used for Islamic rulers, and it is also the name of the Khalifa International Stadium in Qatar, which hosted World Cup matches. It is not the name of a labour system.
- Kafala: The Kafala, or sponsorship, system ties a migrant worker's legal residency and employment status to a single sponsoring employer in the host country. It has been widely criticised by human rights groups for creating conditions that make workers vulnerable to exploitation, and this criticism intensified as Qatar prepared to host the 2022 World Cup.
- Jazeera: Al Jazeera is a major broadcast media network based in Qatar. While it has reported extensively on labour issues in the region, it is a news organisation, not a labour regulation system.
Only Kafala describes an actual system for sponsoring and regulating migrant workers, matching exactly what the question describes.
Therefore, the correct answer is Kafala.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
Where is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) based?
Where is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) based?
Show Hint
Confuse-not: ICJ/ICC $\rightarrow$ The Hague; CAS $\rightarrow$ Lausanne.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Lausanne, Switzerland
- The Hague, Netherlands
- Brussels, Belgium
- Paris, France
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Recall CAS HQ).
CAS (Tribunal Arbitral du Sport) is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland. It often sets up ad hoc divisions at Olympic/World Cup sites for quick rulings.
Step 2 (Eliminate).
The Hague hosts the ICJ/ICC; Brussels is the EU capital; Paris hosts UNESCO and CAS offices occasionally, but not its HQ.
\[ \boxed{\text{(A) Lausanne, Switzerland}} \]
CAS (Tribunal Arbitral du Sport) is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland. It often sets up ad hoc divisions at Olympic/World Cup sites for quick rulings.
Step 2 (Eliminate).
The Hague hosts the ICJ/ICC; Brussels is the EU capital; Paris hosts UNESCO and CAS offices occasionally, but not its HQ.
\[ \boxed{\text{(A) Lausanne, Switzerland}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks where the Court of Arbitration for Sport, referred to in the passage as CAS, is based. Let's check what each city is actually known for hosting.
- Lausanne, Switzerland: CAS, known in French as the Tribunal Arbitral du Sport, has its headquarters in Lausanne. The city is also home to the International Olympic Committee, which fits with CAS's role as the leading body for resolving sports related disputes, including setting up temporary ad hoc divisions at major events like the World Cup.
- The Hague, Netherlands: The Hague hosts major international legal bodies such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, but it is not home to CAS.
- Brussels, Belgium: Brussels is well known as a centre of European Union institutions and NATO, not as the seat of CAS.
- Paris, France: Paris hosts various international organisations, including UNESCO, but CAS's headquarters is not located there.
Only Lausanne matches CAS's actual headquarters, consistent with its close historical ties to the Olympic movement.
Therefore, the correct answer is Lausanne, Switzerland.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
Who is the current captain of the Indian men’s football team?
Who is the current captain of the Indian men’s football team?
Show Hint
When unsure, check recency: Bhutia/Vijayan are 1990s–2000s eras; Chhetri is the long-serving modern captain.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Shabbir Ali
- Bhaichung Bhutia
- Sunil Chhetri
- I.M. Vijayan
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Recent leadership).
Sunil Chhetri has captained India for many years (AIFF senior team), leading in Asian Cup qualifiers and SAFF events.
Step 2 (Eliminate past greats).
Shabbir Ali, Bhaichung Bhutia, and I.M. Vijayan are former stars/captains but not the incumbent.
\[ \boxed{\text{(C) Sunil Chhetri}} \]
Sunil Chhetri has captained India for many years (AIFF senior team), leading in Asian Cup qualifiers and SAFF events.
Step 2 (Eliminate past greats).
Shabbir Ali, Bhaichung Bhutia, and I.M. Vijayan are former stars/captains but not the incumbent.
\[ \boxed{\text{(C) Sunil Chhetri}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks who currently captains the Indian men's national football team. We need to separate the current captain from past stars who once wore the armband.
- Shabbir Ali: Shabbir Ali was a well regarded Indian footballer and captain from an earlier generation, active mainly in the 1970s and 80s. He is not the present day captain.
- Bhaichung Bhutia: Bhutia, often called the Sikkimese Sniper, captained India for many years and was one of the country's most recognised footballers, but he retired from international football in 2011 and no longer holds the role.
- Sunil Chhetri: Chhetri has captained the Indian men's team for a long stretch of years, leading the side through Asian Cup qualifiers, SAFF Championships, and other major fixtures. He is also India's all time leading goal scorer, making him the sport's most prominent current figure and the team's captain.
- I.M. Vijayan: Vijayan was a celebrated striker for India through the 1990s and early 2000s, admired for his skill and goal scoring, but his playing career, and captaincy, ended well before the present day.
Shabbir Ali, Bhaichung Bhutia, and I.M. Vijayan were all important captains or players in their own eras, but the team's current, active captain is Chhetri.
Therefore, the correct answer is Sunil Chhetri.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6
Timothy Weah, the Paris Saint-Germain and U.S. national team player in the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar, is the son of the President of which country?
Timothy Weah, the Paris Saint-Germain and U.S. national team player in the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar, is the son of the President of which country?
Show Hint
Remember: the only Ballon d’Or winner who became a head of state is George Weah (Liberia) — easy hook to recall Timothy’s nationality link.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Senegal
- Uruguay
- Honduras
- Liberia
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Identify the family link).
Timothy Weah is the son of George Weah, Ballon d’Or winner and the President of Liberia.
Step 2 (Eliminate).
Senegal, Uruguay, and Honduras have no such presidential connection with the Weah family.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) Liberia}} \]
Timothy Weah is the son of George Weah, Ballon d’Or winner and the President of Liberia.
Step 2 (Eliminate).
Senegal, Uruguay, and Honduras have no such presidential connection with the Weah family.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) Liberia}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks which country's president is the father of Timothy Weah, a footballer who played for the United States at the 2022 World Cup. Let's check the family connection behind each option.
- Senegal: Senegal has had several presidents over the years, but none of them is related to Timothy Weah or his family.
- Uruguay: Uruguay's presidents have no connection to the Weah family either. This option does not match the clue in the question.
- Honduras: Like the previous two options, Honduras has no link to Timothy Weah's family background.
- Liberia: Timothy Weah is the son of George Weah, a former Ballon d'Or winning footballer who later entered politics and became President of Liberia. This direct father son relationship is exactly what the question is pointing to.
Only Liberia has an actual family connection to Timothy Weah, through his father George Weah's role as president.
Therefore, the correct answer is Liberia.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 7
Which of the following is the oldest football tournament in India?
Which of the following is the oldest football tournament in India?
Show Hint
Oldest in India: Durand Cup (1888); pair it with IFA Shield (1893) to avoid mix-ups.
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Indian Super League
- IFA Shield Cup
- Santosh Trophy
- Durand Cup
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1 (Know the founding years).
Durand Cup was instituted in 1888 (Shimla; now hosted in Kolkata) — among the world’s oldest football tournaments.
Step 2 (Compare with others).
IFA Shield (1893), Santosh Trophy (1941), Indian Super League (started 2014). Hence Durand Cup predates all.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) Durand Cup}} \]
Durand Cup was instituted in 1888 (Shimla; now hosted in Kolkata) — among the world’s oldest football tournaments.
Step 2 (Compare with others).
IFA Shield (1893), Santosh Trophy (1941), Indian Super League (started 2014). Hence Durand Cup predates all.
\[ \boxed{\text{(D) Durand Cup}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks which of the four tournaments is the oldest football competition in India. The key here is comparing when each one actually began.
- Indian Super League: The ISL is India's newest major football competition, launched in 2014 as a franchise based league to raise the profile of the domestic game. Being the newest of the four, it is clearly not the oldest.
- IFA Shield Cup: The IFA Shield, organised by the Indian Football Association, began in 1893. It is genuinely old and historically important, but it started later than one of the other options here.
- Santosh Trophy: The Santosh Trophy is India's premier state level football championship, first held in 1941. It is a long running and prestigious tournament, but far younger than both the Durand Cup and the IFA Shield.
- Durand Cup: The Durand Cup was first played in 1888, originally in Shimla, making it the oldest football tournament in India and one of the oldest in the world still played today. It is now hosted mainly in Kolkata.
Ranking these by their founding years, Durand Cup (1888) comes before IFA Shield (1893), Santosh Trophy (1941), and ISL (2014), in that order.
Therefore, the correct answer is Durand Cup.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions