List of top Legal Studies Questions on Law of Evidence asked in AIBE

Leading questions can be asked during

Expert opinion under Sec.45 is

A sees B running away from a room and afterwards sees C lying down in a pool of blood in the same room. A's evidence in as afar as seeing B running away is direct but as far as the murder is concerned, it is a ----------

Testimony of a witness to the existence or non- existence of the fact or facts in issue is/are

The presumption of continuance of life is contained in Sec. .......................... of the Evidence Act

Evidences to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts is called as

S.99 of the Indian Evidence Act says persons who are not parties to a document or their representatives in interest may give evidence of any facts tending to show a contemporaneous agreement varying the terms of the document. This is based on the principle

The Court's discretion to permit leading questions is confined only to matters which are

Original document is the best evidence - Exception to this rule is contained in

Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years is on whom

According to the Law Commission of India 69 th Report, S.27 of the Indian Evidence Act is based on the

Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh v. Republic of India a famous case coming under S.30 of Evidence Act is also well known as

Statement by a person who is dead is a relevant fact under ---------- of the Indian Evidence Act

The question is whether A murdered B. Marks on the ground, produced by a struggle at or near the place where the murder was committed, are relevant facts under

S.93 of the Indian Evidence Act treats the patent ambiguity as

Statement recorded during investigation under S.161 of Cr.P. C can be used during trial for

Meaning Of Nemo moriturus praesumuntur mentiri

Presumption of law is

Oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it is

Which are the provisions under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with relevancy of opinion of experts

An accomplice is unworthy of credit unless he is corroborated in material particulars is a

The contents of documents may be proved either by

The statements of dead persons are relevant under which provision

Patent ambiguity in interpreting documents renders it

"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption, envisaged under S.112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by proving non- access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case