Question

Who argued that constitution is merely a copy of the 1935 Act?

• A. D.S. Seth
• B. N. C. Benarjee
• C. R.S. Choudhary
• D. Moulana Hasrath Mohani

Hint:

Government of India Act, 1935 heavily influenced the Indian Constitution; this criticism was associated with Moulana Hasrath Mohani.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Concept: During the framing and discussion of the Indian Constitution, several leaders and political thinkers expressed opinions regarding the sources and provisions adopted by the Constituent Assembly.

Step 1: Background of the criticism. A considerable number of provisions in the Indian Constitution were inspired by the Government of India Act, 1935. These included:

• Federal structure.

• Provincial administration.

• Emergency provisions.

• Administrative framework.

Step 2: Criticism by Moulana Hasrath Mohani. Moulana Hasrath Mohani criticized the Constitution by stating that many of its provisions were borrowed from the Government of India Act, 1935. He argued that the Constitution appeared to be largely a continuation of that Act rather than an entirely new framework.

Step 3: Importance of this observation. Although several provisions were indeed adopted from the 1935 Act, the Constitution also introduced:

• Fundamental Rights.

• Directive Principles.

• Independent Judiciary.

• Parliamentary Democracy.

• Universal Adult Franchise.
Thus, the criticism was a political observation rather than a complete constitutional assessment.

Step 4: Conclusion. The person associated with this statement was Moulana Hasrath Mohani. Hence, option (D) is correct.