Question:

Which one of the following, if true, would make the reviewer's choice of the pronoun "who" for Gaia inappropriate?

Updated On: Sep 13, 2024
  • Non-European societies have perceived the Earth as a non-living source of all resources.
  • There is a direct cause-effect relationship between human activities and global climate change.
  • Ghosh's book has a different title: "The Nutmeg's Revenge".
  • Modern western science discovers new evidence for the Earth being an inanimate object.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

If societies outside of Europe perceive the Earth as an inanimate provider of resources, it contradicts the personification implied by the use of "who" for Gaia. Within the passage, the author employs the term "curse" in the title and utilizes the pronoun "who" for Gaia, indicating a viewpoint that regards the Earth as a living, sentient entity. If non-European societies do not share this viewpoint and instead regard the Earth as a non-living resource, it raises questions about the appropriateness of using the pronoun "who" for Gaia in the context of their beliefs. This discrepancy would render the reviewer's selection of the pronoun "who" inappropriate, given the divergent perspectives on the Earth's nature.

So, the correct option is (A): Non-European societies have perceived the Earth as a non-living source of all resources.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

CAT Notification