Comprehension

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige. Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000 private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .
Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing left-wing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact, liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving power from the centre to creating national education systems.
Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.
Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal. He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”. The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action: up your game, or else.

Question: 1

The author of the passage is likely to disagree with all of the following statements, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Sep 17, 2024
  • if we accept that liberalism is a dying ideal, we must work to find a viable substitute.
  • liberalism was the dominant ideal in the past century, but it had to reform itself to remain so.
  • claims about liberalism’s disintegration are exaggerated and misunderstand its core features.
  • the essence of liberalism lies in greater individual self-expression and freedoms.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Given that Option B supports the author's argument in the passage—that liberalism has historically changed to meet obstacles—the author is probably in agree with the statement. Rather than blaming liberalism's success for having being a dominant goal for the previous century, the author highlights liberalism's capacity to handle internal issues and reform.
Option A: The author might take issue with this statement since it goes against the demand to reform liberalism by implying that we should accept the decline of liberalism and look for a replacement.
Option C: The author acknowledges liberalism's present problems and shortcomings while highlighting the movement's historical capacity for self-improvement. Consequently, the author may not entirely agree with the idea that assertions regarding the demise of liberalism are merely false impressions that are exaggerated.
Option D: The author believes that liberalism comprises a variety of philosophical traditions and answers to the trade-off between rights and duties, hence the author may disagree with this statement since it oversimplifies the essence of liberalism.
The correct option is (B): liberalism was the dominant ideal in the past century, but it had to reform itself to remain so.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

All of the following statements are evidence of the decline of liberalism today, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Sep 17, 2024
  • “‘The gap between liberalism’s claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry’ is now so wide that ‘the lie can no longer be accepted,’. . .”
  • “And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery.”
  • “. . . the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast companies . . .”
  • “Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd.”
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Option B: Technology is turning more and more fields of employment into meaningless drudgery. Although this statement discusses technology negatively, it does not always show that liberalism is in decline. Rather than doing so, it draws attention to a possible drawback or criticism in light of technical progress. Technology's detrimental effects on some forms of labor could be viewed as a problem that the liberal framework needs to solve rather than as concrete proof that liberalism is in decline. This is hardly a sign of liberalism's demise, since the same problem was there while it was flourishing. 
The correct option is (B):“And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery.”
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The author of the passage faults Deneen’s conclusions for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Sep 17, 2024
  • its very narrow definition of liberalism limited to individual freedoms.
  • its failure to note historical instances in which the process of declining liberalism has managed to reverse itself.
  • its repeated harking back to premodern notions of liberty.
  • its extreme pessimism about the future of liberalism today and predictions of an ultimate decline.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage does not specifically point out Deneen's frequent focus on premodern conceptions of liberty as a rationale for criticizing his conclusions, hence Option C is the right response. Deneen's tendency to cling to premodern ideas is not particularly addressed in the passage, which instead criticizes him for his severe pessimism about the future of liberalism, his narrow definition of liberalism that is restricted to individual freedoms, and his concentration on the essence of liberalism.
Because Option C contradicts the grounds given in the paragraph for criticizing Deneen's conclusions, it stands out as an exception. 
The correct option is (C):its repeated harking back to premodern notions of liberty.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

The author of the passage refers to “the Davos elite” to illustrate his views on:

Updated On: Sep 17, 2024
  • the fact that the rise in liberalism had led to a greater interest in shared futures from unlikely social classes.
  • the hypocrisy of the liberal rich, who profess to subscribe to liberal values while cornering most of the wealth.
  • the unlikelihood of a return to the liberalism of the past as long as the rich continue to benefit from the decline in liberal values.
  • the way the debate around liberalism has been captured by the rich who have managed to insulate themselves from economic hardships.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Take note of the context in which the author discusses the "Davos elite": "As members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever higher with perks and share options, the biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much atomization but old-fashioned greed." Option B is the only one that mentions the Davos elite's avarice. This is the right response option.
Option A is wrong because the passage calls out the hypocrisy of the Davos elite's actions rather than implying that the advent of liberalism has increased interest in shared futures among improbable socioeconomic classes.
Option C is inaccurate because the paragraph refers to internal inconsistencies and arrogance rather than directly linking the fall in liberal values to the rich profiting. 
Option D is wrong since the passage criticizes the Davos elite's activities rather than focusing on how the rich and powerful control the liberal language.

The correct option is (B):the hypocrisy of the liberal rich, who profess to subscribe to liberal values while cornering most of the wealth.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CAT exam

View More Questions