Comprehension

The document presents a critique of the United Nations (UN) organization, arguing that it has failed to carry out its charter-mandated tasks, specifically to ”maintain international peace and security” and ”to achieve international cooperation” in solving global problems. The author notes growing public frustration with catastrophic humanitarian situations and the failure of peace-keeping operations, leading to widespread scepticism about the possibility of ”revitalization”.

UN Reform Approaches

Discussions on UN reform are divided into two main categories: the conservative approach and the radical approach.

1. Conservative Approach:

The conservative view considers the existing Charter ”practically untouchable” and believes in improving ”collective security” as defined in Chapter VII. Key positions include:

  • US Position: Prioritizes its own interests, supports better management and the creation of an Inspector General, favours enlarging the Security Council (to include Germany and Japan, mainly for financing peace-keeping), and associates the UN with regional organizations like NATO for peace enforcement. The US remains reluctant to allow full application of Chapter VII and views collective security restrictively.
  • Secretary-General’s Position (Boutros Ghali): Advocated for the full implementation of ’collective security’ as envisaged in 1945, including the use of the Military Staff Committee (Article 47) and the conclusion of special agreements (Article 43) for providing armed forces. He also proposed ’peace enforcement units’ under the command of the Secretary-General and wider use of ’preventive diplomacy’. The report candidly recognized the Security Council’s incapacity to deal with threats from a major power.

2. Radical Approach:

The radical approach criticizes the principles of the present system and proposes an overhaul. It reflects increasing doubts about the value of the Charter’s collective security system, especially in intra-State conflicts. Radical proposals include:

  • Establishing an Economic Security Council.
  • Modifying the Charter with less reluctance.
  • Reforming the IMF and World Bank.
  • Developing a new global security system .
  • The creation of a consultative parliamentary assembly at the world level.

Future Outlook:

The author asserts that no major or minor reform has any chance of being implemented now, primarily because the Charter’s amendment procedures (requiring a two-thirds majority including all five permanent Security Council members) preclude agreement. However, he concludes that the continuing deterioration of the global situation, driven by economic integration, rising inequality, and intra-State conflicts, will inevitably lead the political establishment to define a new global institutional structure. This future debate will become highly political.

Question: 1

The author attributes the growing public frustration with the UN primarily to which pair of continuous failures?

Show Hint

When a question asks for a "pair" of reasons, look for sentences in the text that list two or more connected ideas, often joined by "and".
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • The inability to define a new institutional structure and the spread of poverty.
  • The persistent reliance on Chapter VII enforcement and the lack of a Central World Bank.
  • The failure of peace-keeping operations and the spread of unemployment at a world level.
  • The supremacy of the US position and the rejection of the Economic Security Council.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to identify the two main failures of the UN that, according to the author, have led to public frustration.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The first paragraph of Passage 2 states: "The author notes growing public frustration with catastrophic humanitarian situations and the failure of peace-keeping operations..." This sentence directly gives two reasons. "Failure of peace-keeping operations" is one of them. The other is "catastrophic humanitarian situations," which are often linked to economic problems like unemployment and inequality (mentioned later in the text as a driver of global deterioration). Among the given options, option (C) lists "the failure of peace-keeping operations" and "the spread of unemployment at a world level." The latter can be reasonably inferred as a component of the "catastrophic humanitarian situations" and the failure to solve "global problems." No other option aligns as closely with the text.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Based on the direct statements and logical inferences from the text, the pair of failures best represented in the options is the failure of peace-keeping and widespread economic distress like unemployment. Thus, option (C) is the most appropriate answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question asks which pair of continuous failures the author blames for public frustration with the UN. The passage names one failure directly and hints at the other through later context about economic conditions.

  1. Option A (inability to define new structure and poverty): The inability to define a new institutional structure belongs to the future outlook section, describing a current stalemate, not a cause of past frustration. Ruled out as mismatched in timing and function.
  2. Option B (reliance on Chapter VII and lack of Central World Bank): Neither phrase appears as a cause of public frustration in the opening paragraph; both are discussed later as reform debate topics, not as sources of frustration. Ruled out.
  3. Option C (failure of peace keeping and unemployment): The passage explicitly names the failure of peace keeping operations as one source of frustration, and the broader text ties catastrophic humanitarian conditions to economic distress, of which unemployment is a leading example. This matches best.
  4. Option D (supremacy of the US position and rejection of the Economic Security Council): These are reform debate positions discussed much later in the passage, not causes of the initial public frustration described in the opening paragraph. Ruled out.

Since B and D pull from the wrong part of the passage, and A misplaces a future looking obstacle as a past cause, option C is the pair that lines up with the stated sources of frustration.

So the correct answer is option C.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

A primary point of divergence between the US Conservative position and the Secretary-General's Conservative position on security matters, according to the summary is:

Show Hint

When comparing two viewpoints presented in a passage, look for contrasting keywords like "full implementation" versus "restrictively" to pinpoint the main disagreement.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • The US supports the creation of 'peace enforcement units,' while the Secretary. General is opposed.
  • The Secretary-General advocates for the full implementation of 'collective security', while the US restricts its participation in peace-keeping.
  • The US views 'preventive diplomacy' as an illusion, whereas the Secretary-General supports its larger use.
  • The US opposes the enlargement of the Security Council, while the Secretary. General supports the entrance of Japan and Germany.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the main difference between the security views of the US and the Secretary-General, as described under the "Conservative Approach."
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The text outlines the two positions clearly:
- US Position: "views collective security restrictively" and is "reluctant to allow full application of Chapter VII."
- Secretary-General's Position: "Advocated for the full implementation of 'collective security' as envisaged in 1945."
This shows a direct conflict: one side wants full implementation, while the other wants a restricted version. Option (B) accurately captures this fundamental disagreement. Option (D) is factually incorrect according to the text, which states the US favours enlarging the council.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The core difference lies in the scope of 'collective security'. The Secretary-General supports its full implementation, whereas the US prefers a restricted approach. Option (B) correctly identifies this divergence.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question asks for the main point of disagreement between the US and the Secretary General within the same conservative camp. Checking each option against the passage's description of both positions settles it.

  1. Option A (US supports peace enforcement units, SG opposed): This reverses the passage, which credits the Secretary General, not the US, with proposing peace enforcement units. Ruled out as factually backwards.
  2. Option B (SG advocates full collective security, US restricts): The passage states the Secretary General advocated for the full implementation of collective security, while the US views collective security restrictively and is reluctant to allow full application of Chapter VII. This is a direct match.
  3. Option C (US views preventive diplomacy as illusion, SG supports it): The passage credits the Secretary General with proposing wider use of preventive diplomacy, but it never records any US statement calling preventive diplomacy an illusion. Ruled out for lack of support.
  4. Option D (US opposes enlargement, SG supports Japan and Germany entrance): This reverses the passage again; it is the US, not the Secretary General, that favours enlarging the Security Council to include Germany and Japan. Ruled out as factually backwards.

A and D both misattribute positions to the wrong party, and C invents a US stance not found in the text, leaving option B as the one accurately drawn from the passage.

So the correct answer is option B.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

According to the critique's conclusion, the immediate, insurmountable barrier preventing the implementation of any reform, major or minor, is:

Show Hint

Look for causal keywords like "because," "due to," or "the reason is" in concluding paragraphs to find the answer to questions about primary causes or barriers.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • The widespread public scepticism and the rise of nationalist political parties.
  • The Secretary-General's reluctance to give up command over new peace enforcement units.
  • The procedural requirements for amending the Charter, specifically requiring the consensus of all five permanent Security Council members.
  • The ideological debate on global governance and the lack of a complete theoretical framework for the radical approach.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the main obstacle to UN reform, as stated in the "Future Outlook" section.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The "Future Outlook" section addresses this directly. It states, "The author asserts that no major or minor reform has any chance of being implemented now, primarily because the Charter's amendment procedures (requiring a two-thirds majority including all five permanent Security Council members) preclude agreement." This sentence explicitly identifies the amendment procedure, which gives veto power to the five permanent members, as the key barrier. Option (C) is a precise summary of this statement.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The text clearly states that the Charter's amendment procedure is the primary barrier to reform. Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question asks for the single biggest obstacle to any UN reform, according to the passage's concluding section. Testing each option against that section narrows it down.

  1. Option A (public scepticism and nationalist parties): The passage mentions scepticism about the possibility of revitalization earlier, connected to public frustration, but the concluding section names a specific procedural reason for the current deadlock, not a general mood or nationalist politics. Ruled out.
  2. Option B (SG's reluctance to give up command): Nothing in the concluding section discusses the Secretary General's personal attachment to command of peace enforcement units as a barrier to reform. Ruled out.
  3. Option C (Charter amendment procedure requiring all five permanent members): The concluding section states this directly, reform is blocked primarily because the Charter's amendment procedures, requiring a two thirds majority including all five permanent Security Council members, preclude agreement. This matches word for word.
  4. Option D (ideological debate lacking a theoretical framework): The passage does describe an ongoing conservative versus radical debate, but the concluding section identifies a procedural rule, not an unfinished ideology, as the immediate barrier. Ruled out.

A, B and D each substitute a different kind of obstacle for the one the concluding section actually names, leaving option C as the textually supported answer.

So the correct answer is option C.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

The Secretary-General's 'Agenda for Peace' proposed a specific military capability intended to address the gap between traditional peace-keeping and full military action. This proposed unit was explicitly characterized by the summary as being:

Show Hint

Understand the distinction between "peace-keeping" (monitoring a truce) and "peace enforcement" (using force to impose peace). This conceptual difference is key to answering this question correctly.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • Composed of permanent Member State forces under Article 43 agreements.
  • Less heavily armed than peace-keeping forces and under the direction of the Military Staff Committee.
  • More heavily armed than peace-keeping forces and under the command of the Secretary-General.
  • Primarily associated with NATO under a regional security arrangement.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the characteristics of the military units proposed by the Secretary-General to bridge the gap between peacekeeping and war.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The text, under "Secretary-General's Position," mentions that he "proposed 'peace enforcement units' under the command of the Secretary-General." The term "peace enforcement" implies a more robust, forceful capability than traditional "peace-keeping." To fill the gap between peacekeeping and "full military action," these units would logically need to be more heavily armed than standard peacekeepers. The text also explicitly states they would be "under the command of the Secretary-General." Option (C) combines both of these correct characteristics.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The proposed units are described as 'peace enforcement units' under the Secretary-General's command, which implies they are more heavily armed than traditional peacekeepers. Option (C) is the correct description.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question asks how the passage characterises the Secretary General's proposed peace enforcement units. Comparing each option's two claims against the text settles this.

  1. Option A (permanent Member State forces under Article 43): Article 43 agreements are mentioned in the passage, but as part of the older 1945 collective security scheme involving special agreements for armed forces, a separate idea from the newer peace enforcement units the Secretary General proposed. Ruled out as conflating two distinct proposals.
  2. Option B (less heavily armed, under Military Staff Committee): The Military Staff Committee is tied in the passage to Article 47 and the older 1945 scheme, not to the peace enforcement units. Also, enforcement as a term implies more force capacity than ordinary peace keeping, not less. Ruled out on both counts.
  3. Option C (more heavily armed, under SG command): The passage says the units were proposed under the command of the Secretary General, and the term peace enforcement itself signals a step up in force from ordinary peace keeping, fitting the idea of bridging peace keeping and full military action. This matches on both counts.
  4. Option D (associated with NATO): NATO is mentioned in the passage in connection with the US position on regional organisations for peace enforcement, not with the Secretary General's own proposed units. Ruled out as attributing the wrong actor's idea.

A and D pull from the wrong proposal in the passage, and B gets the armament direction backwards, leaving option C as the one accurately describing the Secretary General's units.

So the correct answer is option C.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

The Radical Approach to reform, as outlined in the summary, calls for an institutional overhaul of global economic governance by suggesting which two specific actions related to the Bretton Woods institutions?

Show Hint

When a passage lists proposals using bullet points, carefully check each option against that list. The correct answer will contain items directly from or closely related to the list.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • The full use of Article 42 and the reduction of social inequality.
  • The creation of an Economic Security Council and the replacement of the IMF with a Central World Bank.
  • The implementation of international taxation and the institutionalization of G7 summit meetings.
  • The transfer of significant resources from rich to poor countries and the reform of the World Bank's structure.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for two specific proposals from the "Radical Approach" that relate to global economic governance and the Bretton Woods institutions (IMF and World Bank).
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The text lists the "Radical proposals." Two of these are: "Establishing an Economic Security Council" and "Reforming the IMF and World Bank." The Radical Approach is described as proposing an "overhaul." Option (B) includes "The creation of an Economic Security Council," which is a direct match. It also suggests "the replacement of the IMF with a Central World Bank." While the text says "Reforming," replacement is the most extreme form of reform and fits well within a "Radical Approach" that proposes a complete "overhaul." None of the other options contain proposals listed directly under the Radical Approach section.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The proposals of creating an Economic Security Council and radically overhauling (replacing) the IMF are consistent with the "Radical Approach" described in the passage. Therefore, option (B) is the best answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question asks for the two Radical Approach proposals specifically tied to the Bretton Woods institutions, the IMF and World Bank. Checking the passage's actual list of radical proposals against each option settles this.

  1. Option A (Article 42 and reducing inequality): Article 42 is not mentioned anywhere in the radical proposals list, and reducing inequality is described earlier as a driver of global deterioration, not as one of the listed radical proposals. Ruled out.
  2. Option B (Economic Security Council and replacing IMF with a Central World Bank): The passage's list opens with establishing an Economic Security Council and separately lists reforming the IMF and World Bank. Since the Radical Approach is described as proposing an overhaul rather than a gentle adjustment, replacing the IMF with a stronger central institution is the natural reading of that reform item, and both halves of this option trace to items actually on the list.
  3. Option C (international taxation and G7 institutionalization): Neither international taxation nor G7 summit meetings appears anywhere in the passage's list of radical proposals. Ruled out for lacking any textual basis.
  4. Option D (transferring resources and reforming World Bank structure): Transfer of resources from rich to poor countries is not one of the listed radical proposals; only reforming the IMF and World Bank appears, and it is paired with the IMF, not framed as a resource transfer scheme. Ruled out.

Since C and D introduce items absent from the passage's list, and A misplaces a background driver as a proposal, option B is the pair that actually traces to the passage's own radical proposals.

So the correct answer is option B.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CLAT PG Questions

View More Questions