Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks us to identify which provision of the Indian Constitution reflects the concept of "Miranda rights" found in United States constitutional law.
Step 2: Key Concepts and Approach:
In the US, "Miranda rights" (established in Miranda v. Arizona, 1966) require police to advise an arrested suspect of their right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination.
We need to look at Part III of the Indian Constitution to find the equivalent protection against self-incrimination.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• Article 20(3): This clause provides that "No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself." This is the right against self-incrimination.
• The Core Principle: The right to remain silent during custodial interrogation is an essential part of Article 20(3). Suspects cannot be coerced into making confessions.
• Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978): The Supreme Court of India held that the protective shield of Article 20(3) extends not only to the courtroom trial but also to the stage of police interrogation.
• Statutory Backing: This is further supported by Section 161 of the CrPC (and equivalent provisions in the BNSS), which protects individuals from answering questions that would expose them to a criminal charge.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The concept of Miranda rights is reflected in Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. Hence, Option C is correct.