Concept:
- Conservation succeeds only where the people living closest to the forest have a reason to protect it.
- Local communities both guard the forest and gain from it, and that link is what makes the protection last.
Step 1: They form village institutions that guard the forest.
Under Joint Forest Management, local village institutions are formed and these undertake
protection activities on degraded forest land managed by the forest department. Villagers watch over the area, stop illegal felling and grazing, and allow the cover to grow back.
Step 2: They gain a direct share in the produce.
In return for protecting the forest, members of these communities are entitled to
intermediary benefits such as non-timber forest produce and a share in the timber harvested through successful protection.
Because the benefit is theirs, the community has a real interest in keeping the forest alive.
Step 3: They have protected forests on their own as well.
Villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve fought against mining in the area, and the inhabitants of five villages in the Alwar district declared 1,200 hectares of forest as Bhairodev Dakav Sonchuri, making their own rules against hunting and protecting the wildlife from outside interference.
Step 4: They have led wider conservation movements.
The Chipko movement in the Himalayas resisted deforestation and showed that community afforestation with indigenous species can succeed. Farmers and citizens through the Beej Bachao Andolan and Navdanya have shown that diversified crop production without chemicals is possible and economically viable.
Final Answer: Local communities protect forests by forming village institutions that guard degraded forest land, and they are repaid with non-timber produce and a share in the timber. Their own efforts, from Sariska and Alwar to the Chipko movement, show that conservation works best when the people living near the forest are part of it.