Step 1: Identify the initial prices and income.
Initially, the prices are
\[
p_1=1,\quad p_2=1
\]
and income is
\[
M=100
\]
The utility function is
\[
u(x_1,x_2)=x_1x_2
\]
This is a Cobb-Douglas utility function with equal exponents.
For such a utility function, the consumer spends equal fractions of income on both goods.
Step 2: Find the initial optimal consumption bundle.
Since income is equally divided, expenditure on each good is
\[
\frac{100}{2}=50
\]
Because both prices are equal to \(1\),
\[
x_1=50
\]
and
\[
x_2=50
\]
Thus, the initial utility level is
\[
u_0=50\times50
\]
\[
u_0=2500
\]
Step 3: Write the new prices after price change.
After the price increase,
\[
p_1=1
\]
and
\[
p_2=2
\]
We now calculate the minimum expenditure required to achieve the original utility level
\[
u_0=2500
\]
This minimum expenditure gives the expenditure function and helps determine compensating variation.
Step 4: Use the expenditure minimization condition.
For the Cobb-Douglas utility function
\[
u=x_1x_2
\]
the expenditure function is
\[
e(p_1,p_2,u)=2\sqrt{up_1p_2}
\]
Substitute
\[
u=2500,\quad p_1=1,\quad p_2=2
\]
\[
e=2\sqrt{2500\times1\times2}
\]
\[
e=2\sqrt{5000}
\]
\[
e=2(70.7107)
\]
\[
e=141.4214
\]
Step 5: Calculate Compensating Variation.
Compensating Variation is the additional income needed after the price rise to restore the consumer to the original utility level.
Thus,
\[
CV=e-M
\]
\[
CV=141.4214-100
\]
\[
CV=41.4214
\]
Rounded off to one decimal place,
\[
CV=41.4
\]
Step 6: Final conclusion.
Hence, the compensating variation associated with the price increase is
\[
\boxed{41.4}
\]