Question:

If \( u_1 \) and \( u_2 \) are the velocities of two bodies moving in the same direction before impact and \( v_1 \) and \( v_2 \) are the velocities of the same two bodies after impact, then the coefficient of restitution is

Show Hint

Always subtract velocities in the direction of motion while finding relative velocities in impact problems.
Updated On: Jul 6, 2026
  • \( \dfrac{v_1 - v_2}{u_1 - u_2} \)
  • \( \dfrac{v_2 - v_1}{u_1 - u_2} \)
  • \( \dfrac{u_1 - u_2}{v_1 - v_2} \)
  • \( \dfrac{u_2 - u_1}{v_1 - v_2} \)
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Definition of coefficient of restitution.
The coefficient of restitution \( e \) is defined as the ratio of the relative velocity of separation to the relative velocity of approach along the line of impact.
Step 2: Writing the mathematical expression.
Before impact, relative velocity of approach: \[ u_1 - u_2 \] After impact, relative velocity of separation: \[ v_2 - v_1 \]
Step 3: Formula substitution.
\[ e = \frac{\text{Relative velocity of separation}}{\text{Relative velocity of approach}} \] \[ e = \frac{v_2 - v_1}{u_1 - u_2} \]
Step 4: Conclusion.
The correct expression for the coefficient of restitution is \[ \dfrac{v_2 - v_1}{u_1 - u_2} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The coefficient of restitution \( e \) is defined physically as how much of the closing (approach) speed between two bodies is recovered as a separating speed after their collision. Rather than quoting the formula directly, build it from the physical requirement that \( e \) must be positive whenever the bodies genuinely separate after colliding, and check each option against that requirement.

  1. Option \( \dfrac{v_1 - v_2}{u_1 - u_2} \): Before impact, since the first body is chasing the second (moving in the same direction), \( u_1>u_2 \) so the denominator \( u_1-u_2 \) is positive. After a typical collision the faster body slows and the slower body speeds up, so usually \( v_1<v_2 \) after separation, making the numerator \( v_1-v_2 \) negative; this would make \( e \) come out negative in the ordinary case, which contradicts \( e \) being a non-negative physical quantity, so this ordering is not the correct definition.
  2. Option \( \dfrac{v_2 - v_1}{u_1 - u_2} \): With \( u_1>u_2 \) before impact (denominator positive) and, after a normal separating collision, \( v_2>v_1 \) (the previously slower body now moves faster than the previously faster one, or at least they no longer approach), the numerator \( v_2-v_1 \) is positive too, keeping \( e \) positive as physically expected; this ordering, separation speed over approach speed, correctly matches the physical definition of restitution.
  3. Option \( \dfrac{u_1 - u_2}{v_1 - v_2} \): This inverts the intended ratio, placing the approach speed in the numerator and the separation speed in the denominator, which is backwards relative to the definition of \( e \) as separation-over-approach.
  4. Option \( \dfrac{u_2 - u_1}{v_1 - v_2} \): This is also inverted (approach in the numerator instead of denominator) and additionally has the before-impact terms in reversed order, compounding the mismatch with the standard definition.

Only the ratio that places the after-impact separation speed over the before-impact approach speed, in the correct order that keeps \( e \) non-negative, matches the physical definition.

So the correct answer is \( \dfrac{v_2 - v_1}{u_1 - u_2} \).

Was this answer helpful?
0
0