Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Given the means of the ratings given by R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 as 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8, and 3.4 respectively, we can calculate the total sum of ratings given by each rater as follows:
Similarly, the sum of ratings received by U, V, W, X, and Y are:
Given this information, we can capture the absolute data in the form of a table. Let's represent this partial information as follows:
U | V | W | X | Y | Sum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | a | b | c | d | e | 17 |
R2 | f | g | h | i | j | 11 |
R3 | k | l | m | n | o | 19 |
R4 | p | q | r | s | t | 14 |
R5 | u | v | w | x | y | 17 |
Sum | 11 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 13 |
Where the variables 𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,…,𝑦a,b,c,…,y represent the individual ratings given by each rater to each item. The sums at the end of each row and column represent the total ratings given by each rater and the total ratings received by each item, respectively.
Consider U: Given median = 2, mode = 2, and range = 3:
Consider V: Given median = 4, mode = 4, and range = 3:
Consider W: Given median = 4, mode = 5, and range = 4:
Consider X: Given median = 4, mode = 5, and range = 4:
Consider Y: Given median = 3, mode = 1 and 4, and range = 3:
Considering column R3, the two missing entries should add up to 8. The only possibility is 4 + 4. Therefore, we can fill in 4 for row "U" and 4 for row "V."
Consider column R1, where the missing elements should add up to 17−5−4−1=717−5−4−1=7. The possible combinations are 3 + 4 or 4 + 3.
Now, consider column R5, where the missing elements should add up to 10. We cannot have 4 + 3 + 3 as it contradicts the possible combinations for column R1. Therefore, we must have 2 + 4 + 4.
We can fill column R1 as 3 + 4 and the remaining in column R4. With this, we can complete the table.
R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | Total | |
U | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
V | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 19 |
W | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
X | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 |
Y | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
Total | 17 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 17 |
All ratings can be determined uniquely that is 0.
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days through 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
15 | 15.5 | 16 | 17 |
Table 2 : Ranks of participants on each day | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
Akhil | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Bimal | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Chatur | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days through 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
15 | 15.5 | 16 | 17 |
Table 2 : Ranks of participants on each day | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
Akhil | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Bimal | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Chatur | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
---|---|---|---|
Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |
Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |