For Solution 1,
\(\Lambda_{m1} = \frac{1000K}{M}\)
\(M = \frac{74.5}{74.5} \times \frac{1000}{106} = 10^{-3} \, M\)
[density of solution = 1 g/mol]
\(\Lambda_1 = \frac{1000 \times 129 \times 10^{-4}}{10^{-3}}\)
\(= 129 \times 10^2 \, \text{S cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1}\)
\([K = \frac{x}{R} = \frac{129 \times 10^{-2}}{100}]\)
For Solution 2,
\(K = \frac{129 \times 10^{-2}}{50}\)
\(\Lambda_2 = \frac{1000 \times 129 \times 10^{-2}}{50M}\)
\(M = \frac{149}{74.5} \times \frac{1000}{106}\)
\(= 2 \times 10^{-3} \, M\)
\(\Lambda_2 = \frac{1000 \times 129 \times 10^{-2}}{50 \times 2 \times 10^{-3}}\)
\(= 129 \times 10^2 \, \text{S cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1}\)
\(\frac{\Lambda_1}{\Lambda_2} = 1\)
\(\frac{\Lambda_1}{\Lambda_2} = 1000 \times 10^{-3}\)
The ratio of molar conductivity of solution 1 and solution 2 is,
\(\frac{\Lambda_1}{\Lambda_2} = x \times 10^{-3}\)
On comparing,
\(⇒ x = 1000\)
So, the answer is 1000.
A body of mass 1000 kg is moving horizontally with a velocity of 6 m/s. If 200 kg extra mass is added, the final velocity (in m/s) is:
Conductance is an expression of the ease with which electric current flows through materials like metals and nonmetals. In equations, an uppercase letter G symbolizes conductance. The standard unit of conductance is siemens (S), formerly known as mho.
Conductance in electricity is considered the opposite of resistance (R). Resistance is essentially the amount of friction a component presents to the flow of current.