List of top Language Comprehension Questions asked in Management Aptitude Test

Read the passage, and answer the questions following it.
One of the greatest public speaking failures of my career took place last summer at Valparaiso University, Indiana where I addressed a convention of editors of college newspapers. I said many screamingly funny things but the applause was dismal at the end. During the evening. I asked one of my hosts in what way I had offended the audience. He replied that they had hoped I would moralize. They had hired me as a moralist.
So now when I speak to students, I do moralize. I tell them not to take more than they need, not to be greedy. I tell them not to kill, even in self-defence. I tell them not to pollute water or the atmosphere.
I tell them not to raid the public treasury. I tell them not to commit war crimes or to help others to commit war crimes. These morals go over very well. They are of course echoes of what the young say to themselves.
I had a friend from Schenectady visited me recently, and he asked me this, "Why are fewer and fewer young Americans going into science each year? I hold him that the young were impressed by the war crimes trials at Nuremberg. They were afraid that careers in science could all too easily lead to the commission of war crimes. They don't want to work on the development of new weapons. They don't want to make discoveries which will lead to improved weapons. They don't want to work for corporations that pollute water or atmosphere or raid the public treasury. So they go into other fields. They become physicists who are so virtuous that they don't go into physics at all.
At the University of Michigan, at Ann Arbor, the students have been raising hell about the university doing secret government work. I go to talk with some of the students about the protests that had been made against the recruiters of Dow Chemicals, manufacturers of napalm among other things.I offered the opinion that an attack on a Dow recruiter was about as significant as an attack on the doorman or theatre usher. I didn't think the recruiter stood for anything.
I called attention to the fact that during the Dow protest at Harvard a couple of years back, the actual inventor of napalm was able to circulate through the crowd of protestors unmolested. I didn't find the fact that he was unmolested reprehensible. I saw it as a moral curiosity. Though I did not mean to suggest to the students at Ann Arbor that the inventor of napalm should have been given one hell of a time.
The Election Commission (EC) has proposed an amendment to the 1950.Representation of the people Act (RPA) to ban all opinion polls once the election process is under way. which could be months before actual elections are held. Following the passing of tlhe 2009 RPA (Second Amendment) Bill, a ban on exit polls conducted while the polling process is going on is already in place. While there may be acase for banning opinion polls or their republication while polling is actually underway and poll campaigning has ceased why all opinion polls should be banned is unclear. Nevertheless major political parties argued for this at last year s consultations on electoral reform,and the EC appears to have succumbed. Proponents of the ban argue, contradictorily, that, opinion polls tend to influence voters and voting patterns besides creating confusion galore. also drawn attention to complaints about political parties funding some opinion polls. But such a draconiah ban on all opinion polls is tantamount to muzzling freedom of expression• as well as the right of the media and research organisations to undertake such pre-poll exercises. These. after all, are an important metric to assess the people 's mood and their aspirations. and their perception of political parties. Multiple opinion polls competing with each other restrict the possibility o manipulation by anyone pre-poll survey. Finally, the perception that voters are gullible enough to be duped by by opinion polls, is an affront to their intelligence and political sense.
The larger global geo-economic backdrop to the next decade (2013-23) is the likely emergence of as the world's largest single-state economy overtaking the USA towards the end of this period. The 'critical question will be whether China under a new leadership will subscribe to the existing global status quo or adopt a revisionist approach — and seek to alter the contours of i global governance and related protocols to its own template. Within Asia, the texture and orientation of the triangular and bilateral relationship that will emerge between China, Japan and India over the next decade against the backdrop of the US in relative economic decline will exude many contradictory compulsions — the leitmotif of the 'contra-polar'world order. While China may be the world's most prosperous state in GDP terms, it will still rank low in per capita income and the US is likely to retain its military supremacy for atleast two decades. . It is instructive that India is also likely to join the ranks of the world 's three largest single-state economies by 2030 with an estimated GDP of the US - $ 6.68 trillion — though it will be a distant subaltern when 'compared to China - $25.6 trn and USA - $ 22.8 trn. Will China's intent to remain Asia's unchallenged hegemony impact Indian interests? The Chinese track-record over the last two decades (since the end of the Cold War in 1991) has been chequered and many of its initiatives have been either directly adversarial or inimical to Indian interests. The most disturbing development has been the covert nuclear weapon and missile support that China has provided to Pakistan. The Mumbai carnage of November 2008 is a case in point. But much greater pro-active perspicacity is called for than what Delhi has exuded to date.